A Fast Literature Search Engine based on top-quality journals, by Dr. Mingze Gao.

  • Topic classification is ongoing.
  • Please kindly let me know [mingze.gao@mq.edu.au] in case of any errors.

Are Fairness Opinions Fair the Case of Mergers and Acquisitions

Resource type
Authors/contributors
Title
Are Fairness Opinions Fair the Case of Mergers and Acquisitions
Abstract
Over the period 1994-2003, 80% of targets and 37% of acquirers obtain a third-party assessment of the fairness of a merger or acquisition. These fairness opinions do not affect deal outcomes when used by targets, but they affect deal outcomes when used by acquirers. The deal premium is lower in transactions if the acquirer obtains a fairness opinion, and is further reduced if multiple advisors provide an opinion. However, the acquirer's announcement-period return is 2.3% lower if the acquirer has a fairness opinion, especially if the acquirer pays a high premium, indicating that investors are skeptical of these transactions.
Publication
Journal of Financial Economics
Volume
91
Issue
2
Pages
179-207
Date
2009
Citation
“QJ” Qian, J., Kisgen, D. J., & Song, W. (2009). Are Fairness Opinions Fair the Case of Mergers and Acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics, 91, 179–207.
Link to this record