A Fast Literature Search Engine based on top-quality journals, by Dr. Mingze Gao.

  • Topic classification is ongoing.
  • Please kindly let me know [mingze.gao@mq.edu.au] in case of any errors.

Capturing Knowledge within and across Firm Boundaries: Evidence from Clinical Development

Resource type
Author/contributor
Title
Capturing Knowledge within and across Firm Boundaries: Evidence from Clinical Development
Abstract
How do firm boundaries influence employees' acquisition of information? Using detailed project-level data and qualitative evidence, I document that pharmaceutical firms are more likely to outsource the coordination of data-intensive clinical trials, while they are more likely to assign knowledge-intensive trials to internal teams. Managers do not choose between market and hierarchy, but between the hierarchy of the firm—in which subjective performance evaluations are combined with flat explicit incentives—and the hierarchy of its subcontractor—whose virtue stems precisely from the ability to provide high-powered incentives on a narrow set of monitorable tasks.
Publication
American Economic Review
Volume
94
Issue
5
Pages
1591-1612
Date
2004-12
Citation
Azoulay, P. (2004). Capturing Knowledge within and across Firm Boundaries: Evidence from Clinical Development. American Economic Review, 94, 1591–1612.
Link to this record