Knowledge that Transforms

We develop a model to study the efficiency of socially responsible investing (SRI) as a mechanism to control firms' externalities. When SRI is not too popular, responsible investors favor strategies that lead to a concentration of SRI in a subset of firms in the economy. This concentration can mitigate coordination issues in adopting green technologies, but it can also crowd out the green investments of excluded firms and increase the price of green products. In equilibrium, responsible investors continue to favor concentration even as SRI becomes more popular, and concentrate the most when concentration is least desirable.

Litigation risk is an important source of motivation for auditors to conduct high‐quality audits, but theory suggests that certain lawsuits will have a more salient disciplining effect on auditor behavior. To this end, we identify lawsuits naming an individual partner as a co‐defendant along with the audit firm. We then examine how these lawsuits affect subsequent behavior of other auditors in the office of the sued partner. Relative to lawsuits naming only the firm, our results indicate that lawsuits naming individual partners as co‐defendants are significant office‐level events that motivate a meaningful response from non‐sued audit partners in the form of higher quality and fees on existing clients and more careful client portfolio management. These results have practical implications about how auditor litigation incentivizes individual auditors to fulfill their professional duties. For regulators and audit firms seeking to promote audit quality, these findings highlight the disciplining effect of auditors' concern for their personal reputation and litigation exposure. Furthermore, audit committees, clients, and investors may observe elevated audit quality, effort, and fees following partner‐level litigation in the local office.

Auditor-client negotiations over contentious accounting issues can shape reported financial outcomes, yet little is known about how communication dynamics between audit committee (AC) members and auditors influence client negotiation behavior. We conduct an experiment in which experienced financial executives, assuming the role of chief financial officer, negotiate a disputed inventory obsolescence allowance with a simulated audit partner in the presence of an AC member; the AC member's distributive communication style (offensive vs. defensive) and the audit partner's reflective empathy (high vs. low) are manipulated between participants. Drawing on relational framing theory in interpersonal communication, we predict and find that a distributive-offensive AC communication style leads clients to establish their reporting positions and concede less to the auditor's proposed adjustment, unless it is accompanied by high reflective empathy from the audit partner, which neutralizes this resistance. This pattern emerges in the client's initial negotiation position and persists through the final negotiated allowance. Our findings suggest that auditors can use empathetic communication as a strategic tool to defuse the competitive posture that an assertive governance signal may provoke. Overall, our results provide insights into how AC members' and auditors' communication styles jointly shape client negotiation behavior, highlighting the importance of communication strategies in achieving effective audit negotiation outcomes.

Audit teams may consult with their firm’s national office to obtain specialized expertise, satisfy regulatory and quality control requirements, and demonstrate due professional care. We describe the consultation process based on PCAOB standards, firm methodologies, and auditor interviews. We explain different types of consultations and highlight differences in the determinants and usefulness of mandatory versus voluntary consultations. Using PCAOB inspection data, we show that formal consultations are largely predictable based on engagement characteristics and, on average, are not associated with audit quality. However, two subsets of formal consultations that focus on accounting issues and occur earlier in the engagement process are associated with greater regulatory compliance and higher audit quality. Hence, an increasing reliance on all types of consultations does not automatically translate into higher audit quality. Collectively, our findings deepen our understanding of auditors’ use of national office consultations and their implications for audit practice. Data Availability: Audit engagement data from the PCAOB are proprietary; other data are from public sources.

We examine how private foundations allocate charitable capital in response to recipient need. Using financial shocks to peer foundations (who fund the same recipients), we isolate exogenous changes in the marginal value of grants. Foundations respond to need by reallocating grants across recipients, particularly for scientific causes and longer donor–recipient relationships. However, their annual grantmaking budgets show little intertemporal flexibility, instead prioritizing capital preservation. Among governance characteristics, founder involvement predicts both cross-sectional responsiveness and intertemporal conservatism. Our findings highlight a tension: founders’ charitable intent supports effective allocation, but their inclination toward capital preservation can hinder impact maximization.

We explore whether bank regulatory oversight affects the ability of environmental enforcement to reduce industrial emissions. A major objective of environmental enforcement is to reduce industrial emissions by encouraging firms to employ greener production processes and technologies. However, such changes often require external financing obtained from banks, and prior research shows that regulatory oversight of banks can affect bank lending. We find that, on average, the reduction in air pollution in response to county‐level environmental enforcement is attenuated in counties exposed to increased bank regulatory oversight, as measured by severe enforcement actions. Furthermore, we show that the negative impact of bank regulatory oversight on small business lending to affected counties is the likely mechanism behind this on‐average effect. However, when bank regulatory oversight targets banks with stronger capitalization, we find that the negative effect of bank regulatory oversight on environmental enforcement is mitigated. Collectively, our findings suggest that bank regulation has a nuanced effect on the extent to which environmental enforcement reduces emissions, indicating that one regulator's mission can impact the objectives of another.

Prevailing theories of financial intermediation assume an integrated financial sector with frictionless risk‐sharing. However, we identify substantial risk‐sharing frictions linked to intermediary specialization using currency derivatives markets as a laboratory. Using confidential supervisory data covering $25 trillion in daily bank exposures, we document imperfect hedging in banks' FX‐swap intermediation: banks rarely hedge their synthetic dollar lending with maturity‐matched foreign safe assets. Intermediaries specialize in markets in which they have expertise in managing the associated exposures, giving rise to cross‐market variation in deviations from covered‐interest parity. Our results highlight the importance of intermediary specialization and its impact on risk premia.