Knowledge that Transforms

The municipal bond market has long been criticized for its lack of disclosure, which prior research often attributes to weak regulatory oversight. We offer another explanation: tax clienteles. Most municipal bonds are tax-exempt, and thus primarily attract high-tax retail investors, who may lack the incentive or ability to demand or monitor disclosures. In contrast, taxable bonds attract a broader investor base, including institutional investors who can demand disclosure. We find that issuers provide more continuing disclosures in years with taxable bonds outstanding relative to years without. Issuers also increase disclosures after issuing their first taxable bond and decrease disclosures after calling their last taxable bond. Exploiting a tax law change, we find that disclosures increase following plausibly exogenous increases in taxable bond issuances. Our results suggest that the tax clienteles for municipal bonds affect issuers’ disclosure practices and can inform those concerned with disclosure noncompliance in the municipal bond market.

ABSTRACT This study investigates whether auditors incorporate investor information demand when determining key audit matter (KAM) disclosures. We measure investor information demand using a unique dataset of investor inquiries submitted through investor interactive platforms (IIPs) established by the China Securities Regulatory Commission. At the topic level, we find that auditors are more likely to disclose a given topic as a KAM when investors raise more inquiries on that topic. At the aggregate level, a higher proportion of inquiries devoted to accounting issues is associated with both a greater number of KAMs and longer KAM disclosures. Importantly, following the introduction of KAM reporting, managers’ footnote disclosures become more aligned with heightened investor inquiries, reinforcing our interpretation that the documented effects reflect auditors’ responses to investor inquiries rather than merely mirroring managerial disclosure changes. Overall, our findings suggest that auditors incorporate investor information demand into KAM disclosures.

This study investigates the practice of re-audits—where an incoming audit firm re-audits the prior year’s financial statements previously examined by a predecessor audit firm. We examine the costs and benefits of such re-audits. We find that re-audits are more likely when the risks of misstatement are high and when incoming auditors can expect to win more clients by identifying material misstatements overlooked by predecessor auditors. Our results show that incoming auditors who perform re-audits are more successful in winning new clients from predecessor auditors. Moreover, re-audits result in significantly more restatements. However, consistent with the resource-intensive nature of re-audits, we also find that they are associated with longer audit delays and higher audit fees. Overall, we conclude that re-audits have important consequences for financial statement users, incoming auditors, and predecessor auditors.

OLS estimates of linear regression models become imprecise when distributional assumptions about the regression errors are not strictly met. Such situations frequently arise in applied research due to the heavy-tailed distributions of dependent variables. Using simulated data and replication settings, we show how robust regression estimation can produce more policy-relevant inferences by increasing the precision of estimates, improving test power, and tightening confidence intervals. We provide guidance to researchers on when and how to apply robust estimation as alternative to OLS and how to combine robust regression estimators with fixed effects and clustered standard errors. Given the non-random nature of observations typically downweighted by robust regression estimators, we also illustrate the importance of inspecting the robust regression weights and discuss how these weights can provide useful insights about heterogeneity in treatment effects or relations of interest.

We study the informational value of trading networks in over-the-counter (OTC) markets. Using detailed transaction-level data from the corporate bond market, we show that investors with larger dealer networks make superior trading decisions before changes in credit fundamentals, resulting in better risk-adjusted performance. We trace these investors’ superior trading decisions to trading connections where dealers are most likely to have access to novel credit-relevant information, supporting the interpretation that these investors obtain private information through their trading networks. Collectively, our evidence highlights the importance of trading relationships for investors’ private information acquisition.

Building on economic theories of cultural transmission, we examine how audit partners’ cultural trust influences audit outcomes. Based on the “presumptive doubt” perspective of professional skepticism, we propose that audit partners from trusting cultures are more likely to rely on management’s assertions, while still exercising a high degree of caution and not naively trusting management. Consistent with our prediction, we find that audit partners from trusting cultures commit fewer Type I errors when issuing going concern opinions, without significantly increasing Type II errors. The reduction in Type I errors is primarily found when audit partners normally tend to be more conservative, and it is attenuated when management is less trustworthy. At the same time, audit partners from trusting cultures are also associated with more within-GAAP earnings management, suggesting that increased trust entails a cost. Collectively, our findings offer new insights into how cultural trust affects the assurance of accounting information.

We examine the role of firms’ internal information quality (IIQ) in designing executive incentive contracts. We find that higher IIQ is associated with a greater number of performance metrics and increased dissimilarity from peer firms’ contracts, particularly along non-financial dimensions. These relations hold when we examine changes in IIQ that are likely induced by plausibly exogenous shifts in two financial accounting standards. We further find that incorporating more numerous and more dissimilar non-financial metrics is positively associated with future profitability, but only when IIQ is high. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that the quality of a firm’s internal information is a friction in performance metric selection.