We analyze the optimal capital structure of a bank issuing countercyclical contingent capital, i.e., notes to be converted into common shares in poor macroeconomic conditions. A comparison of the main effects produced by the countercyclical asset with the simple equity-debt capital structure, the non-countercyclical contingent capital and the countercyclical callable bond is conducted. We demonstrate that this type of asset reduces the spread of straight debt and is effective in reducing the asset substitution incentive. The reduction of bankruptcy costs is strong only when the countercyclicality feature is removed. Contingent capital is useful for macroprudential regulation and we show that the countercyclical feature is important depending on priorities (moderate the asset substitution incentive or reduce bankruptcy costs).

We empirically test the effectiveness of the Merton (1974) model in measuring the sensitivity of corporate bond returns to changes in equity value. We study the main variables that affect the performance of the model and relax the assumption of normally distributed rates of return. Results show that less than 6% of the bonds have a hedge ratio within 10% from the model predicted value. Volatility, time to maturity, size, distress, liquidity and information quality are found to be significant determinants of the efficacy of the model.