Knowledge that Transforms

To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
1448 results ✕ Clear filters

Some Additional Evidence on the LIFO-FIFO Choice Using Replacement Cost Data

Journal of Accounting Research 1982 20(2), 738
Since the 1939 Revenue Act requires a firm using LIFO for taxes to use LIFO for financial reporting, a firm wishing to minimize its tax payments by the use of LIFO must use LIFO as a reporting method. The tax savings to the firm adopting LIFO equals the difference between FIFO cost of goods sold (CGS) and LIFO CGS times the firm's marginal tax rate. Biddle [1980] presents evidence suggesting that the cash flow consequences of adopting LIFO are different for LIFO and FIFO firms. In this study, Biddle's work was replicated using a different method of estimating cash flow consequences.

Conjoint Measurement and the Analysis of Noisy Data: A Comment

Journal of Accounting Research 1982 20(2), 450
In a previous study reported here Moriarity and Barron [1976] used conjoint measurement to model the materiality judgment process of audit partners. They did so following the approach suggested by Krantz and Tversky [1971] in which axiomatic conjoint measurement (ACM) is used to identify the functional form of the decision maker's judgment model, and then numerical conjoint measurement (NCM) is applied to find the best-fitting scale values (part-worth functions).' Shortly thereafter, the American Accounting Association's Committee on Human Information Processing (AAA [1978]) suggested that conjoint measurement would be useful in the study of certain aspects of human information processing in accounting research, particularly for testing alternative composition rules which uses only ordinal properties of the data [1978, p. 32]. Composition rules refer to the functional forms (e.g., additive, multiplicative, etc.) of decision makers' judgment models.2 In a later paper, Moriarity and Barron [1979] examined the preaudit materiality judgments of audit partners, in which they assumed an additive model and used a holistic orthogonal parameter estimation procedure (Barron and Person, [1979]). Swieringa [1979] criticized this

Models in Managerial Accounting

Journal of Accounting Research 1982 20, 117
Joel S. Demski, David M. Kreps, Models in Managerial Accounting, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 20, Supplement: Studies on Current Research Methodologies in Accounting: A Critical Evaluation (1982), pp. 117-148