Laurence Ball argues that the Federal Reserve (the Fed) could—and should—have bailed out Lehman Brothers so that it did not have to declare bankruptcy. He presents compelling evidence that it could have. I argue that the view that the Fed should not bail out Lehman is reasonable under the circumstances the Fed was in at the time. The Lehman bankruptcy is a case study in bailouts and the attendant moral hazard problem that expectations of bailouts create. The lessons learned imply a clear case for appropriate regulatory intervention to solve the problems created when governments cannot commit themselves to not undertake bailouts.

Recent developments in rationing theory are used to examine the differences between the effects of in-kind and cash transfers on labor supply. It is not possible to tell a priori which type of transfer will cause the greater reduction in hours of work; the answer depends on the extent to which in-kind transfers distort consumption choices and on the relationship between the transferred commodities and leisure. Hicks-Allen complements can cause greater reductions in labor supply than equally generous cash transfers, while strong Hicks-Allen substitutes can induce increases in market work.

Previous research finds that fundamental macroeconomic news has little effect on stock prices. We show that after allowing for different stages of the business cycle, a stronger relationship between stock prices and news is evident. In addition to stock prices, we examine the effect of real activity news on proxies for expected cash flows and equity discount rates. We find that when the economy is strong the stock market responds negatively to news about higher real economic activity. This negative relation is caused by the larger increase in discount rates relative to expected cash flows.

One of the tasks of this paper is to draw attention to Fritz Schmidt and his pioneering work in current value accounting which anticipated essential features of both Edwards and Bell's (1961) work by 40 years, and the current cost legislations and standards of the United Kingdom, the United States, and Canada by roughly six decades. Above all, I am trying to relate Schmidt's work to that of Edwards and Bell, thereby clarifying some misunderstandings that still surround this relationship. Schmidt needs a champion on the North American continent, and I have tried to assume this often misunderstood task. By direct reference to and translations from Schmidt's magnum opus , I attempt to demonstrate that Schmidt's theory possesses the following qualities: It distinguishes clearly between general purchasing power adjustments and current value adjustments. It does eliminate realized holding gains (cost savings) from the operating section, and presents an income concept equivalent to the “Current Operating Profit” of Edwards and Bell. It clearly separates operating gains from holding gains (though rarely endeavors to separate real from fictional holding gains, since it favors the physical capital maintenance basis of income measurement). It applies current costs also to manufacturing operations. It does not fail to deal with the current costs of other inputs, and generally abandons the historical cost basis. Résumé. Un des objectifs de cet article, est de faire ressortir le travail de pionier de Fritz Schmidt sur la comptabilité à la valeur actuelle qui anticipa les caractéristiques essentielles des travaux de Edwards et Bell (1961) de 40 ans et les lois et normes sur le coût actuel du Royaume‐Uni, des Etats‐Unis et du Canada d'approximativement six décades. Avant tout, j'essaie de relier les travaux de Schmidt à ceux de Edwards et Bell, afin de clarifier certaines méprises qui existent toujours relatives à cette relation. Schmidt a besoin d'un champion sur le continent nord américain et j'ai essayé d'assumer cette tâche souvent mal comprise. En me référant aux travaux de Schmidt et à certaines traductions, j'essaie de démontrer que la théorie de Schmidt possède les qualités suivantes: Elle distingue clairement les ajustements du pouvoir général d'achat des ajustements de la valeur actuelle. Elle élimine les gains de détention réalisés (économies de coûts) de la section exploitation et présente un concept de revenu équivalent au “Bénéfice hors postes non courants” de Edwards et Bell. Elle sépare clairement les gains d'exploitation des gains de détention (quoiqu'elle ne s'efforce pas de séparer les gains de détention réels des fictifs, puisqu'elle favorise la base de la préservation de la capacité de production pour mesurer le revenu). Elle utilise les coûts actuels aussi pour les exploitations manufacturières. Elle n'oublie pas de traiter des coûts actuels des autres intrants et abandonne de façon générale la base du coût historique.

Anand V. Swamy of Williams College reviews “India Is Broken: A People Betrayed, Independence to Today” by Ashoka Mody. The Econlit abstract of this book begins: “Presents a narrative of the modern history of India from the perspectives of successive Indian leaders, chronicling the erosion of social norms and decay of political accountability from 1947 to 2021 that have detrimentally affected the country's economy and political system.”