The sharp decline in the stock prices of several firms at which employees held a large fraction of their 401(k) plan assets in company stock, including Enron, Global Crossing, Lucent, and Polaroid, has sparked a public-policy debate about investment options in 401(k) plans. At many large firms, particularly those with retirement saving plans that combine elements of an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) with a traditional 401(k), a substantial fraction of defined-contribution retirement-plan assets are held in company stock. Such undiversified holdings are a source of concern because they raise the volatility of the retirement wealth for employees and expose some workers to the prospect of very small retirement values. Holding an undiversified position in employer stock may be particularly costly because of the potential correlation between company stock returns and the value of the worker’s human capital, which may depend on the company’s prospects. This paper reviews the extent of undiversified company-stock investments in 401(k) plans, evaluates the cost of such investments from an employee’s perspective, and discusses a range of policy actions that could address the excessive concentration of retirement plan assets.

This paper explores the effect of discretion in estate valuation techniques on the effective estate tax burden on different asset classes. For some assets, such as liquid securities, there is relatively little discretion in valuation. For other assets, such as partial interests in closely-held businesses, family limited partnerships, and real assets or collectibles that are traded in thin markets, estate valuations may be more difficult to establish. Estate tax filers may therefore be able to select valuations that reduce the reported value of the estate assets, and therefore the effective estate tax burden. In 1998, estates that invoked the doctrine of "minority discounts" in valuing non-controlling interests in limited partnerships claimed an average discount of 36 percent for these assets, relative to their estimated market value. More than half of all limited partnership assets reported on estate tax returns were valued using this doctrine. This suggests that for a given statutory estate tax rate, the effective estate tax burden may be greater on assets that are easily valued than on difficult-tovalue assets. A comparison of the mix of assets reported on estate tax returns, and the mix the estate tax returns would be predicted to hold, given data from the Survey of Consumer Finances, is consistent with lower relative valuations for difficult-to-value assets.