To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

2 results

An investigation of the asymmetric link between credit re-ratings and corporate financial decisions: “Flicking the switch” with financial flexibility

Journal of Corporate Finance 2014 29, 37-57
Using a large sample of non-financial US listed firms over the period from 1985 to 2009, we analyze the interactive effect of financial flexibility and credit re-ratings on corporate investment and financing decisions. Essentially, we document that financial flexibility (inflexibility) “flicks the switch” in the re-rating upgrades (downgrades) scenario. Specifically, a credit rating upgrade (downgrade) for financially flexible firms is followed by a reduction (no change) in their cost of capital, an increase (no change) in their capital expenditure and an increase (no change) in their net debt versus net equity issuance. In contrast, a rating upgrade (downgrade) for financially inflexible firms is followed by an insignificant change (an increase) in their cost of capital, an insignificant change (a decrease) in their capital expenditure and an insignificant change (a decrease) in their net debt versus net equity issuance. We offer plausible explanations for these asymmetric relations.

Management connectedness and corporate investment

Journal of Banking & Finance 2021 124, 106042 open access
In response to the mixed views about the appointment-based connectedness between CEO and subordinate C-level executives, we systematically analyze the net effect of top management team (TMT) connectedness in the context of real corporate investment activities. We document a robust negative association between TMT connectedness and corporate investments, driven by the reduction in corporate R&D spending and acquisitions. Further tests show investment inefficiency in firms with closely connected managers, suggesting an average weak governance effect of TMT connectedness. To explain such an effect, we find that connected executives tend to avoid risky investments and shirk investment responsibilities when facing little career concerns. Interestingly, the agency cost and coordination benefit of interconnected TMT are not mutually exclusive. The adverse investment effect of TMT connectedness tempers in firms facing financial constraints and even reverses during the Global Financial Crisis when financial constraints are most likely binding.