We investigate the relative pricing of an innovated security called “instalment receipts” (IRs). IRs are securities that evidence the purchase of some underlying securities on an instalment basis. Theoretically, we show that investors with borrowing restrictions will be willing to pay for the leverage benefit embedded in IRs. We then provide an empirical support for our argument. The observed premium in IR price over the underlying price implies that by using IRs, the issuers benefit from both an increase in demand and a reduction in the price concessions that they have to make to ensure the success of their offerings.

This paper develops a geometric methodology with which to analyze the no-arbitrage condition, with special reference to tax arbitrage in government bonds. Using this methodology, it is shown that a country's bond-issuing authority might be able to painlessly avoid market equilibria which is likely to induce tax arbitrage activities. The simple bond-issuing policy which will achieve this goal is identified, and its limitations are discussed. An examination of the Canadian and Israeli bond markets shows that adopting the prescribed bond-issuing policy does not meaningfully impinge on the bond-issuing authority's ability to sell bonds.

This study estimates the after-tax term structure of real interest rates using the prices of UK linked and non-linked gilts over the period from 25 January 1986 until 25 October 1993. The impact of differential taxation and the existence of “noise” in observed market prices is found to produce a significant impact on the parameter estimation of term structure models when compared to methods, such as Brown and Schaefer (Brown, R., Schaefer, S., 1994. Journal of Financial Economics 35, 1–42), that did not. Two major observations can be made regarding the estimates for spot real interest rates. Firstly, the volatility of the short-term rate is much lower than that found by Brown and Schaefer (1994) which provides a better fit with the predictions of the CIR single factor model for interest rates. Secondly, consistent with Rumsey (Rumsey, J., 1993. An impact of the assumptions about taxes on the estimation of the properties of interest rates. Working Paper), there appears to be some evidence to suggest that single factor interest rate models produce a better fit to interest rates on an after-tax basis than on a before tax basis.

The goal of this paper is to determine whether the tax-timing option effect documented in the U.S. bond market exists outside the U.S. Examining Canadian tax rules suggests that the tax option effect is simpler and less valuable than in the U.S. This view is supported by simulations in the spirit of Constantinides and Ingersoll (1984) as well as by empirical tests conducted on bond triplets following Jordan and Jordan (1991).