To examine the role of executive compensation in corporate acquisition decisions, we compare executive compensation of firms undertaking large acquisitions to a control sample of non-acquirors. Before the acquisitions, we find a positive relation between firm size and compensation for executives of acquirors; we do not find such a relation for non-acquirors. This result suggests an ex ante expectation that larger firm size will result in larger managerial remuneration. Ex post, however, large acquisitions have a small positive effect on total compensation. When we separate good from bad acquisitions, we find that good acquisitions increase compensation, whereas bad acquisitions do not have a positive effect on compensation.

We investigate stock price reactions to Internet-related name changes in a market downturn. In contrast to the Internet boom period, during which there was a surge of dot.com additions, in the bust period, there is a dramatic reduction in the pace of dot.com additions accompanied by a rapid increase in dot.com name deletions. Following the Internet “crash” of mid-2000, investors react positively to name changes for firms that remove dot.com from their name. This dot.com deletion effect produces cumulative abnormal returns on the order of 64% for the 60 days surrounding the announcement day. Our results add support to a growing body of literature that documents that investors are potentially influenced by cosmetic effects and that managers rationally time corporate actions to take advantage of these biases.