To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
98 results

FinTech penetration, charter value, and bank risk-taking

Journal of Banking & Finance 2024 161, 107111
Using a sample of U.S. community banks and FinTech loans data from LendingClub and Prosper, I find that banks’ future change in risk-taking is positively associated with their current exposure to FinTech penetration. Path analysis shows that FinTech penetration influences bank risk-taking through the erosion of bank charter value. Additionally, cross-sectional analysis shows that the risk-increasing effect of FinTech penetration is stronger for banks with lower ex-ante charter value and greater reliance on hard information. My results are robust to alternative measures of bank risk-taking and FinTech penetration, propensity score matching, and a battery of sensitivity and additional tests. Regarding policy implications, the findings imply that reasonable estimations of banks’ charter value may serve as an early indicator of banks’ future risk-taking incentives

FinTech, Investor Sophistication, and Financial Portfolio Choices

The Review of Corporate Finance Studies 2023 12(4), 834-866 open access
This paper analyzes the links between advances in financial technology, investors’ sophistication, and the composition and returns of their financial portfolios. We develop a simple portfolio choice model under asymmetric information and derive some theoretical predictions. Using detailed microdata from Banca d’Italia, we test these predictions for Italian households over the period 2004-2020. In general, heterogeneity in portfolio composition and in returns between sophisticated and unsophisticated investors grows with improvements in financial technology. This heterogeneity is reduced only if financial technology is accessible to everyone and if investors have a similar capacity to use it

FinTech adoption and financial inclusion: Evidence from household consumption in China

Journal of Banking & Finance 2022 145, 106668
This paper provides micro-level evidence on how FinTech adoption affects household consumption and consumption inequality. Our hypothesis is that through FinTech's payment facilitation and credit constraint alleviation, higher FinTech adoption by households fosters financial inclusion by promoting consumption. Financial inclusion is especially increased for households that traditionally consumed less, which suggests that FinTech could reduce consumption inequality. By combining region-level FinTech adoption measures with household-level representative data of consumption, we find that higher FinTech adoption by a household increases household consumption and reduces consumption inequality across households. Using the distance to Hangzhou from the city in which a household is located as an instrument variable to capture the exogenous variation in FinTech adoption yields results with similar economic and statistical significance. In addition, traditional financial infrastructure is still a prerequisite for the benign distributive impacts provided by FinTech credit, which demonstrates the need for further welfare-improving policies. Our paper adds to the literature by documenting FinTech to be a market force that contributes to financial inclusion

The Entrepreneurial Finance of Fintech Firms and the Effect of Investments in Fintech Startups on the Performance of Corporate Investors

Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 2025 open access
We analyze how corporate direct investments in fintech startups affect startup performance and that of investing firms. Corporate investment in fintech startups is associated with a greater likelihood of successful exit, more and higher-quality innovation, and a greater inflow of high-quality inventors. A stacked difference-in-differences analysis shows that direct investments enhance the operating performance and equity-market valuation of corporate investors in the financial services sector, but not those in the nonfinancial sector. We establish two channels that drive fintech startups’ performance improvements: strategic alliance formation between investors and startups, and enhanced startup monitoring by corporate investors

Did FinTech Lenders Facilitate PPP Fraud

Journal of Finance 2023 78(3), 1777-1827 open access
In the $793 billion Paycheck Protection Program, we examine metrics related to potential misreporting including nonregistered businesses, multiple businesses at residential addresses, abnormally high implied compensation per employee, and large inconsistencies with jobs reported in another government program. These measures consistently concentrate in certain FinTech lenders and are cross‐verified by seven additional measures. FinTech market share increased significantly over time, and suspicious lending by FinTechs in 2021 is four times the level at the start of the program. Suspicious loans are being overwhelmingly forgiven at rates similar to other loans

Shadow Banking in a Crisis: Evidence from Fintech During COVID-19

Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 2021 56(7), 2320-2355
We analyze lending by traditional as well as fintech lenders during COVID-19. Comparing samples of fintech and bank loan records across the outbreak, we find that fintech companies are more likely to expand credit access to new and financially constrained borrowers after the start of the pandemic. However, this increased credit provision may not be sustainable; the delinquency rate of fintech loans triples after the outbreak, but there is no significant change in the delinquency of bank loans. Borrowers holding both loan types prioritize the payment of bank loans. These results shed light on the benefits provided by shadow banking in a crisis and hint at the potential fragility of such institutions when delinquency rates spike

Financial statements vs. FinTech: A discussion of Minnis, Sutherland, and Vetter

Journal of Accounting and Economics 2024 78(2-3), 101716
Minnis, Sutherland, and Vetter (MSV) documents a sharp decline in lenders’ collection of attested financial statements (including unqualified audits, reviews, and compilations) over the period 2002 to 2017. They attribute this change to lenders adopting new technology and new non-bank lenders entering the lending market. In this discussion, I explore several dimensions of their findings. First, I provide a framework for usefulness of financial statement information in debt contracting. Using this framework, I consider how financial statements may be useful for the small and medium loans the authors study, and how this role could be disrupted. Second, I consider how financial technology (FinTech) has disrupted traditional lending and potentially changed the role of financial statements. Finally, I consider the implications for this change on the accounting profession

How Valuable Is FinTech Innovation

Review of Financial Studies 2019 32(5), 2062-2106 open access
We provide large-scale evidence on the occurrence and value of FinTech innovation. Using data on patent filings from 2003 to 2017, we apply machine learning to identify and classify innovations by their underlying technologies. We find that most FinTech innovations yield substantial value to innovators, with blockchain being particularly valuable. For the overall financial sector, internet of things (IoT), robo-advising, and blockchain are the most valuable innovation types. Innovations affect financial industries more negatively when they involve disruptive technologies from nonfinancial startups, but market leaders that invest heavily in their own innovation can avoid much of the negative value effect.ReceivedMay 31, 2017; editorial decision September 30, 2018 by Editor Andrew Karolyi

Trust as an entry barrier: Evidence from FinTech adoption

Journal of Financial Economics 2025 169, 104062 open access
This paper studies the role of trust in incumbent lenders (banks) as an entry barrier to emerging FinTech lenders in credit markets. The empirical setting exploits the outbreak of the Wells Fargo scandal as a negative shock to borrowers’ trust in banks. Using a difference-in-differences framework, I find that increased exposure to the Wells Fargo scandal leads to an increase in the probability of borrowers using FinTech as mortgage originators. Utilizing political affiliation to proxy for the magnitude of trust erosion in banks in a triple-differences specification, I find that, conditional on the same exposure to the scandal, a county experiencing a greater erosion of trust has a larger increase in FinTech share relative to a county experiencing less of an erosion of trust. Estimating treatment effect heterogeneity using generic machine learning inference suggests that borrowers with the greatest decrease in trust in banks and the greatest increase in FinTech adoption have similar characteristics

FinTech Credit and Entrepreneurial Growth

Journal of Finance 2024 79(5), 3309-3359 open access
Based on automated credit lines to vendors trading on Alibaba's online retail platform and a discontinuity in the credit decision algorithm, we document that a vendor's access to FinTech credit boosts its sales growth, transaction growth, and the level of customer satisfaction gauged by product, service, and consignment ratings. These effects are more pronounced for vendors characterized by greater information asymmetry about their credit risk and less collateral, which reveals the information advantage of FinTech credit over traditional credit technology