Knowledge that Transforms

Using analyst-lender affiliation in syndicated loans as a proxy for differential access to private information, we examine how unaffiliated analysts respond to this disadvantage. We find that unaffiliated analysts are more likely to herd toward affiliated analysts following loan origination, leading to improved forecast accuracy but weaker market reactions, consistent with reduced information content. In addition, herding analysts improve their forecast accuracy for other firms in their portfolios relative to nonherding analysts, suggesting a reallocation of effort. To capture information acquisition directly, we analyze IP address data from SEC EDGAR log files and find that unaffiliated analysts increase search activity, driven primarily by those not designated as herding. Although herding behavior wanes after the first year post-loan, elevated EDGAR searches persist for three years. Overall, our study provides novel evidence on how selective access to private information influences analysts’ competitive behavior. Data Availability: Data used in this study are available from public sources identified in the text, subject to the terms and conditions of those sources.

Does going public affect the amount and type of corporate international tax planning? Using a panel of U.S. corporate tax return data from 2004 to 2018, we show that IPO completion is associated with the rapid implementation of multinational foreign tax structures. Specifically, within three years after filing for an IPO, firms (1) expand their presence in low-tax jurisdictions, (2) enter into cross-border agreements that accompany intangible asset transfers to foreign subsidiaries, and (3) increase the likelihood and level of foreign related-party income-shifting payments. Effects are strongest among firms with strong capital market pressure to hit post-IPO earnings targets, firms with high R&D spending pre-IPO, and firms with limited ability to use net operating loss carryforwards. We contribute to the nascent literature studying tax implications of IPOs by documenting the types and timing of specific tax strategies that enable public firms to remain lightly taxed in the post-IPO period.

An asset owner designs an asset-backed security and a signal about its value. After experiencing a liquidity shock and privately observing the signal, he sells the security to imperfectly competitive buyers. With flexible information design, the security’s informational sensitivity is a blessing, not a curse. Among double-monotone securities, the issuer prefers to sell the asset in combination with an appropriate signal rather than design more complex securities. Within the class of monotone securities, live-or-die securities are optimal and strictly dominate asset sales. When signals are restricted to be sufficiently informative about the upside, debt and additional-tier-1 debt become optimal.

Mortgage fraud was a leading force behind the 2008 financial crisis. We measure the fraudulent income overstatement at the bank-ZIP Code-year level as the difference in the local growth between reported income in mortgage applications and the income based on IRS data. We find that overstated income is positively associated with banks’ internal control weaknesses over financial reporting and negatively associated with subsequent remediation of such weaknesses. The associations are concentrated among banks that integrate their accounting and operation processes, as proxied by the adoption of an Enterprise Resource Planning system. Finally, using the removal of internal control provisions in the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act in 2005 as a shock to internal control quality, we find that affected banks experience increased income overstatement on mortgage applications. Data Availability: Data used in this study are available from the public and proprietary sources identified in the article. Access to proprietary data is subject to the relevant providers’ licensing restrictions.

This study examines how tenured BAF experience and navigate institutional structures while advancing their careers. Leveraging a qualitative approach, we find BAF encounter recurring forms of marginalization embedded in organizational structures that lead to social identity threats that destabilize their identities as scholars and teachers. BAF respond to these threats by employing agentic and self-preserving coping responses designed to affirm identity and negotiate career advancement. Although coping responses can be effective on an individual level, they do not transform institutional structures and can provoke pushback that reinscribes marginalization. The findings unsettle common assumptions that effort in conditions marked by objectivity and neutrality drives career advancement and highlight the institutional structures and invisible labor that BAF navigate to achieve career advancement. We fill the void in the literature examining how career advancement unfolds within racialized conditions of academic institutions and advance research on minoritized group status in accounting academia.

Firms typically design incentive systems to motivate employees and advance firm objectives, including productivity (i.e., maximizing output) and efficiency (i.e., minimizing input). However, there remains little empirical research on the potential psychological effects of adopting a productivity versus efficiency focus on employee risk perceptions and decision-making. To address this important gap, we examine how these different incentive foci affect employee target setting under participative budgets. We predict and find that employees perceive efficiency incentives as riskier than productivity incentives, leading to lower target setting. Moreover, consistent with our theory, this effect disappears in the absence of outcome uncertainty. We also find employees are less likely to achieve their target and have higher error rates under efficiency incentives, despite setting easier targets. Overall, our findings suggest that efficiency incentives, relative to productivity incentives, can have detrimental effects on target setting and subsequent performance in participative budgeting settings. Data Availability: Contact the authors.

People’s right to free speech can have profound effects on how firms discharge their social and environmental responsibilities. We examine these effects by analyzing the impact of the staggered enactment of anti-SLAPP free speech laws across U.S. states on firms’ corporate social responsibility (CSR) behavior. We theorize that, following the enactment of anti-SLAPP laws, firms enhance their CSR activities as an economically effective means to counter negative publicity from stakeholders. Supporting this idea, we find that firm CSR activity increases after the enactment of anti-SLAPP laws, accompanied by an increase in stakeholder criticism of firms’ social and environmental practices. Further, we observe an increase in the level of CSR disclosure. The link between anti-SLAPP law enactment and subsequent CSR engagement is stronger in states with more comprehensive anti-SLAPP protections than in those with weaker protections. Data Availability: From public sources identified in the study. Some may require a subscription.

Using US Supreme Court’s narrow-decision on Shelby v. Holder as a shock that diluted voting rights of Black Americans in covered counties, we document the relationship between political voice and economic decision-making. We show fewer Black Americans buy homes after their de-facto disenfranchisement, reflected through lower mortgage applications. Among those who apply for mortgages, there is a flight to Black lenders. Leveraging individual-level survey data, we show confidence in government and financial institutions plays a significant role in driving these effects. Our findings demonstrate that the effects of disenfranchisement extend beyond the ballot box to fundamental economic decisions like homeownership.