To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
2 results

A net stable funding ratio for Islamic banks and its impact on financial stability: An international investigation

Journal of Financial Stability 2016 25, 47-57
The Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB) is the standard setting body for the Islamic banking industry. The IFSB, while endorsing the Basel III accord, modified the criteria to calculate the Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) to cater for the unique aspects of the Islamic banking industry. In this paper, we calculated the modified NSFR of 136 Islamic banks from 30 jurisdictions between 2000 and 2013 and explored the potential impact the requirements of this ratio has on the financial stability of Islamic banks after controlling for bank, country, and market-specific variables. The empirical findings suggest that the modified NSFR has a positive impact on the financial stability of Islamic banks during the sample period. However, the marginal impact of the NSFR on stability diminishes as the size of the bank increases. The results remained robust after applying an alternative measure of stability and using an alternative estimation model based on an instrumental variable approach. These results validate the use of the IFSB’s modified NSFR for Islamic banks as a regulatory measure.

Impact of sovereign credit ratings on systemic risk and the moderating role of regulatory reforms: An international investigation

Journal of Banking & Finance 2022 145, 106654
This paper investigates the association between systemic risk and sovereign credit ratings issued by the three credit rating agencies (CRAs), i.e., Moody's, S&P, and Fitch, for 65 countries from Jan-2000 to Dec-2020. Results show that a positive (negative) sovereign rating action (SRA) is associated with a significant decline (increase) in the systemic risk. However, variations exist among the three CRAs as Moody's actions are associated with a larger impact, followed by S&P and Fitch. Furthermore, results show an asymmetric response of systemic risk towards negative rating signals. Analyzing the effect of regulatory reforms to reduce the shock element in the announcement of sovereign rating signals provides mixed results. After the regulatory reforms, only S&P's overall rating actions impact the systemic risk, but the asymmetrical response persists for all CRAs. These results have certain policy implications for regulators, bank managers, and other stakeholders of financial systems.