We investigate a controversial and hotly debated issue of whether low stock return synchronicity (SRS) means more or less informative stock prices using three exogenous events: an anti-corruption campaign launched by the Chinese Government, a stock market crash in China, and firms’ public exposure of fraud. Investigating the changes in SRS associated with these events helps mitigate endogenous issues since these events have distinctive relationships with companies’ stock price informativeness. Our results show that firms’ SRS declines significantly after the anti-corruption campaign aiming to improve corporate governance and after firms’ public exposure of fraud. The SRS is substantially higher during and after the stock market crises. Firms located in more developed regions have lower SRS than those in less developed regions. These results consistently indicate an inverse relationship between the SRS and stock price informativeness.

When members of the same household have different risk preferences, whose preference matters more for investment decisions and why? We propose an intrahousehold model that aggregates individual preferences at the household level as a result of bargaining. We structurally estimate the model, analyze the determinants of bargaining power, and find a significant gender gap. Gender differences in individual characteristics, as well as gender effects, partially explain the gap. These patterns hold broadly across Australia, Germany, and the United States. We further link the distribution of bargaining power to households’ perceived gender norms in a cross-sectional analysis. (JEL G11, G41, G50)