Using a unique hand-collected sample, we study market reactions to mining developers announcing project finance loans. We document a significant three-day abnormal return of 2.6% and a 3.4% reduction in abnormal bid-ask spread around loan approvals, consistent with information transfer from private lenders to equity holders and reduction in asymmetric information. Cross-sectional analysis reveals a negative association between announcement return and hedging requirements specified in loan contracts, which becomes insignificant after controlling for treatment effects of hedging. Specialist banks do not charge lower rates but are more likely to impose hedging requirements, consistent with rent extraction due to bargaining power. (JEL G30, G32)

ABSTRACT This study investigates the economic consequences of the IFRS 3 (2008) requirement for fair valuing earnouts. Using a hand-collected sample of earnout fair value estimates in acquisitions completed by Australian firms, we find that a significant portion of acquirers overstate initial earnout liabilities and strategically reverse them as operating gains to boost post-M&A earnings. These overstatements are more pronounced when acquirers face investment- and performance-related pressure but attenuated in the presence of high-quality auditors and debt-financed deals. Acquirers also obfuscate earnout-related disclosures, inhibiting investors’ assessment of earnout values. By doing so, managers extend their tenure. Further analysis reveals that IFRS 3 (2008) leads to a significant increase in both the frequency and magnitude of earnouts in public acquirers’ transactions. Overall, we highlight the accounting benefit of earnouts for acquirers under IFRS 3 (2008), with implications for investors, analysts, auditors, and standard setters. Data Availability: Data are available from the public sources cited in the text. JEL Classifications: G34; M41.