A framework is developed for decomposing product price changes into changes in input prices, technical efficiency, and deviations of price from unit cost. This framework facilitates the measurement of productivity growth in noncompetitive industries. The history of American steel rail prices between 1879 and 1910 is analyzed, and it is concluded (in contrast with much recent work) that productivity growth remained rapid until the twentieth century and that the steel industry was sufficiently collusive so that the rail producers received the benefits of that productivity growth as excess profits.

A Farewell to Alms advances striking claims about the economic history of the world. These include (1) the preindustrial world was in a Malthusian preventive check equilibrium, (2) living standards were unchanging and above subsistence for the last 100,000 years, (3) bad institutions were not the cause of economic backwardness, (4) successful economic growth was due to the spread of “middle class” values from the elite to the rest of society for “biological” reasons, (5) workers were the big gainers in the British Industrial Revolution, and (6) the absence of middle class values, for biological reasons, explains why most of the world is poor. The empirical support for these claims is examined, and all are questionable.

A new basis for an international poverty measurement is proposed based on linear programming for specifying the least cost diet and explicit budgeting for nonfood spending. This approach is superior to the World Bank's $1-a-day line because it is (i) clearly related to survival and well being; (ii) comparable across time and space since the same nutritional requirements are used everywhere while nonfood spending is tailored to climate; (iii) adjusts consumption patterns to local prices; (iv) presents no index number problems since solutions are always in local prices; and (v) requires only readily available information. The new approach implies much more poverty than the World Bank's, especially in Asia.

A framework is developed for decomposing product price changes into changes in input prices, technical efficiency, and deviations of price from unit cost. This framework facilitates the measurement of productivity growth in noncompetitive industries. The history of American steel rail prices between 1879 and 1910 is analyzed, and it is concluded (in contrast with much recent work) that productivity growth remained rapid until the twentieth century and that the steel industry was sufficiently collusive so that the rail producers received the benefits of that productivity growth as excess profits.

ECONOMISTS and statisticians who construct estimates of total factor productivity or who estimate production functions or systems of consumer demand functions are often forced to aggregate subsets of their data. In order to perform this aggregation, an index number formula is generally used. A price index P(pO, pl, x?, xI) is defined to be a function P of the prices of the N commodities to be aggregated in periods 0 and 1,p?-(pll, . . . , PNO) and pl (pl,.'.. PN'), respectively, and of the corresponding quantities utilized during periods 0 and 1, x? (xi?, . . .,XNO) andX1 _ (xi', . . .,XN1), respectively. A quantity index Q(p0, pl, x?, xl) is defined to be another function Q of the price and quantity vectors for the two periods. Generally, we assume that P and Q satisfy Fisher's (1922) weak factor reversal test:

We test between cooperative and extractive theories of the origins of government. We use river shifts in southern Iraq as a natural experiment, in a new archeological panel dataset. A shift away creates a local demand for a government to coordinate because private river irrigation needs to be replaced with public canals. It disincentivizes local extraction as land is no longer productive without irrigation. Consistent with a cooperative theory of government, a river shift away led to state formation, canal construction, and the payment of tribute. We argue that the first governments coordinated between extended households which implemented public good provision.