To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
4 results

The Role of Productive Thinking in Affecting Student Learning with Microcomputers in Accounting Education.

The Accounting Review 1986 61(1), 143-157
ABSTRACT: This study Investigates the role of productive thinking in affecting student attitudes toward, and performance with, microcomputer spreadsheet programs in a managerial/ cost accounting course. Productive thinking is defined as thinking based on an understanding of the nature of problems rather than on memorization of facts and rules. In this experiment covering two academic quarters, students initially indicated strong desire to use microcomputers, but their enthusiasm diminished after the classroom experience with their use. Although there was no performance difference across integrative versus non-integrative assignments, performance was positively related to previous computing experience. Students did feel, however, that computers should be used in other accounting courses. Students also reported that they experienced greater learning with integrative course assignments than with repetitive, non-integrative assignments. This finding suggests that a benefit of computer use in teaching accounting may be the opportunity it offers for problem solving based on Understanding rather than on memorization.

Admission to Accounting Programs: Using a Discriminant Model as a Classification Procedure.

The Accounting Review 1985 60(3), 508-518
ABSTRACT: This paper uses discriminant analysis as a foundation for an admissions policy for accounting majors. The discriminant model is capable of correctly classifying students into Accept/Reject groups with a statistical accuracy of 78 percent using only three characteristics--grade-point average at 45 semester hours, grade in college mathematics, and grade in English composition. The model, more importantly, correctly classifies 90 percent of those students who, according to the model's criterion, should be rejected. Alternatively, the model is capable of identifying the same percent of those students who perform exceedingly well in accounting. This technique, together with a review and appeal procedure, provides a method of restricting enrollment while still meeting today's demand for quality accounting students.

The Role of Productive Thinking in Affecting Student Learning with Microcomputers in Accounting Education

The Accounting Review 1986 61(1), 143-157
[This study investigates the role of productive thinking in affecting student attitudes toward, and performance with, microcomputer spreadsheet programs in a managerial/cost accounting course. Productive thinking is defined as thinking based on an understanding of the nature of problems rather than on memorization of facts and rules. In this experiment covering two academic quarters, students initially indicated strong desire to use microcomputers, but their enthusiasm diminished after the classroom experience with their use. Although there was no performance difference across integrative versus non-integrative assignments, performance was positively related to previous computing experience. Students did feel, however, that computers should be used in other accounting courses. Students also reported that they experienced greater learning with integrative course assignments than with repetitive, non-integrative assignments. This finding suggests that a benefit of computer use in teaching accounting may be the opportunity it offers for problem solving based on understanding rather than on memorization.]

Admission to Accounting Programs: Using a Discriminant Model as a Classification Procedure

The Accounting Review 1985 60(3), 508-518
[This paper uses discriminant analysis as a foundation for an admissions policy for accounting majors. The discriminant model is capable of correctly classifying students into Accept/Reject groups with a statistical accuracy of 78 percent using only three characteristics-grade-point average at 45 semester hours, grade in college mathematics, and grade in English composition. The model, more importantly, correctly classifies 90 percent of those students who, according to the model's criterion, should be rejected. Alternatively, the model is capable of identifying the same percent of those students who perform exceedingly well in accounting. This technique, together with a review and appeal procedure, provides a method of restricting enrollment while still meeting today's demand for quality accounting students.]