To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.
Fields:
30 results
✕ Clear filters
Liquidity and Market Structure: Discussion
David K. Whitcomb, Liquidity and Market Structure: Discussion, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 43, No. 3, Papers and Proceedings of the Forty-Seventh Annual Meeting of the American Finance Association, Chicago, Illinois, December 28-30, 1987 (Jul., 1988), pp. 634-637
Session Topic: Investments--Empirical Studies: Discussion
David K. Whitcomb, Session Topic: Investments--Empirical Studies: Discussion, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 32, No. 2, Papers and Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the American Finance Association, Atlantic City, New Jersey, September 16-18, 1976 (May, 1977), pp. 442-445
Economies of Scale in Industrial Plants
Evidence on the Presence and Causes of Serial Correlation in Market Model Residuals
Robert A. Schwartz, David K. Whitcomb, Evidence on the Presence and Causes of Serial Correlation in Market Model Residuals, The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 12, No. 2 (Jun., 1977), pp. 291-313
Comment: Assessing the Impact of Stock Exchange Specialists on Stock Volatility
In a recent article in this Journal, Amir Barnea [1] proposes a criterion for assessing the market-making efficiency of New York Stock Exchange specialists. The appealing aspects of Barnea's method are that it uses publicly available data (common stock prices) and operates on a variable of primary concern to investors, the variance of returns on common stock. The difficulty we see in applying his approach, however, is that Barnea's performance criterion can be sensitive to a number of factors in addition to any impact the specialist might have, and that effective specialist intervention might have either a positive or negative impact on the performance measure. Thus, his specialist ranking seems to be quite misleading, and his empirical findings appear to be amenable to a substantially different interpretation than that which he provides.