The theory of industrial location, 254.— Preliminary deductions in the case of the shoe industry, 255.— History of the distribution of the industry. Period 1630–1760: non-localized hand work, 257.— Period 1760–1860: localization of the hand industry, relation of railroads to factors of transportation and labor cost, 259.— Period 1860–1900: effect of mechanization, shifts in the tanning industry, changes in financing; equalization of regional advantages, 264.— Period since 1900: rapid style changes, foreign markets, labor organization, 269.— Outlook for the future, 273.— The theory in the light of experience in the shoe industry, 274.

I. Marginal productivity ignores important forms of investment, 627; and is inaccurate even for "productive" investment, 628.— The "law" of diminishing productivity vague and subject to serious exceptions, 630.— Marshall's doctrine of marginal net product does not explain general wages, 631; but throws light on the process of equilibrium-seeking, 632.— The application of labor to land, 633.— II. "Demand for labor" a misleading expression, 634.— Factors which determine it, 635.— The "method of increments" not involved, 638.— In what sense wages are residual, 639.— III. Practical implications: for changes in working hours, 640; consumer borrowing, 641; raising of wages above equilibrium rate, 642; elasticity of demand for labor, 643.

Reviews the book "Laissez Faire and After," by O. Fred Boucke.

Reviews the book "Foreign Corporations."

Reviews the book "A Survey of a Retail Trade Area," by Fred M. Jones.

Reviews the book "Department Store Food Service," by Ina M. Hamlin and Arthur H. Winakor.

Reviews the book "War Debts and World Prosperity," by Harold G. Moulton and Leo Pasvolsky.

Reviews the book "Prices," by George F. Warren and Frank A. Pearson.

Reviews the book "Credit Policies of the Federal Reserve System," by Charles O. Hardy.

The article illustrates through an example in a coaching class the fallacies of assumptions in problem solving demonstrations by teachers of accounting. An experience of many years as an accounting teacher plus an experience of some years as an examiner for the licensing of accountants has convinced the author that the fallacy of assumption is one of the things responsible for the heavy toll exacted of the candidates who attempt professional examinations. Apparently, assumption is believed to provide an easy, or lazy person's way out of what seems to be at least at first glance a perplexing situation. A trial balance given in a problem does not balance. This fact alone affords no reason for the student or candidate assuming that the difference must be adjusted through some account like notes or accounts payable, or through some other account as far fetched. Perhaps a careful study of the situation will show that the requirements may be met almost completely by ignoring the discrepancy.