I examine the extent to which workers who lose jobs obtain work in alternative employment arrangements, including temporary work and independent contracting, and obtain voluntary or involuntary part‐time work. I find that job losers are significantly more likely than nonlosers to be in both temporary jobs (including on‐call work and contract work) and involuntarily part‐time jobs. I also find evidence that temporary and involuntary part‐time jobs are part of a transitional process subsequent to job loss leading to regular full‐time employment.

The standard Principal–Agent (PA) model assumes that the principal can control the agent's consumption profile. In an intertemporal setting, however, Rogerson (1985, Econometrica53, 69–76) shows that given the optimal PA contract, the agent has an unmet precautionary demand for savings. Thus the standard PA model is invalid if the agent has access to credit markets. In this paper we generalize the standard PA model to allow for saving and borrowing by the agent. We show that the impact of such access critically depends upon the treatment of default. If default is not permitted, efficiency is strictly reduced by the introduction of credit markets, and the equilibrium level of borrowing or saving is indeterminate in the model. If default is allowed, however, the optimal contract depends upon the level of bankruptcy protection in the economy, which is described by a minimum level of wage income. We show that there is an optimal intermediate range of bankruptcy protection. Within this range, allowing default increases efficiency in the economy relative to the case of no default. Also, the model predicts specific levels of consumer debt, interest rates, and default rates as functions of the level of bankruptcy protection level. Journal of Economic Literature Classification Numbers: D80, G21, G28, J30.

This article attempts to determine whether wage records reported by employers to state unemployment insurance (UI) agencies provide a valid alternative to more costly retrospective sample surveys of individuals as the basis for measuring the impacts of employment and training programs for low‐income persons. We analyze UI data and survey data for a sample of low‐income adults and youths from 12 sites in the National Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) study. Our comparison indicates that impact estimates based on UI data and survey data were usually comparable. However, average surveyreported earnings were higher than average UI‐reported earnings.

This article integrates strategic product market analysis with price-taking asset pricing theory. We demonstrate that a firm's market power can lead to scale-dependent and potentially infinite required returns. Scale dependency, which we relate to risk spillovers between expansionary and existing cash flows, reflects the divergence of incremental from existing required returns. The firm-specific nature of risk spillovers potentially destroys the concept of a common industry "risk class". Our analysis raises important questions regarding the validity of widely used "comparables" methods for determining risk-adjusted discount rates.

Abstract This article examines the contribution of hedging to firm value and the cost of hedging in a unified framework. Optimal hedging and firm value are explicitly linked to firm risk, the type of debt covenants and the relative priority of the hedging contract. It is shown that in some cases hedging is possible only if the counterparty to the forward contract also holds a significant portion of the debt. Also, the spread in the hedging contract reduces the optimal amount of hedging to less than the minimum-variance hedge ratio. Among other results this article elucidates why some firms hedge using forward contracts while other firms hedge in the futures markets, as well as why higher priority forward contracts are more efficient hedging vehicles. JEL Classification numbers: G13, G22 and G33.

We develop a model of corporate myopia in which the interaction between asymmetric information and short-term trading by equity holders induces firms to undertake short-term rather than long-term projects, which are intrinsically more valuable. We study the effectiveness of alternative policy prescriptions in eliminating myopia. We show that a capital gains tax cut for long-term equity holders induces optimal project selection; an across-the-board tax cut has no such impact. We characterize the long-term capital gains tax rate which eliminates corporate myopia. Further, we show that a long-term capital gains tax cut does not induce a bias toward inefficient long-term projects when it is, in fact, short-term projects which are more valuable. In contrast, an investment tax credit directed at long-term projects leads to such a bias. Finally, we show that reducing the long-term capital gains tax rate to the level required to eliminate myopic investment behavior may also lead to an increase in government tax revenues.Journal of Economic Literature Classification Numbers: H21, G31, D82.

We investigate the market valuation of earnings and book value amounts prepared under IAS and US-GAAP to provide evidence for the debate between the US SEC and NYSE on whether foreign firms should be allowed to list in the US using IAS. We find that the US-GAAP earnings reconciliation adjustment is value-relevant and that US-GAAP amounts are valued differently for market value and return models, but not a price-per-share model. We also find that IAS amounts are more highly associated with price-per-share than US-GAAP amounts, and that US-GAAP amounts are more highly associated with security returns than IAS amounts.

Abstract This paper investigates the influence of Swiss firms' disclosure policy and of their financial analysts' coverage on stock price abnormal reactions to the publication of the annual reports. It first shows that, after controlling for the number of analysts, the absolute abnormal returns are significantly and positively affected by the rating measure used as a proxy of the informational quality of annual reports. It furthermore emphasises asymmetry in the relationship between stock price abnormal reactions and two informational variables, namely the quality of the firm's disclosure policy and its financial analysts' coverage. It appears that while positive abnormal returns are significantly and positively related to the rating variable, negative abnormal returns are only affected by the number of financial analysts. The inverse relationship between abnormal negative returns and the financial analysts' coverage supports the fact that competition among analysts reduces investors' adverse selection problem. Finally, the study evidences a non-linear relationship between rating and positive abnormal returns which is meaningful for the “good” and “very good type” firms and thus emphasises the signaling role played by a firm's financial disclosure policy.