Abstract. This paper examines the impact of dividend distribution decrease announcements on the security prices of master limited partnerships. (MLPs). These firms, whose earnings are not subject to U.S. Federal Income Tax, are marketed stressing high dividend yields. Since most MLPs are natural resource firms with only one line of business, cuts in dividend policy by one firm caused by industry‐wide factors might impact the market's pricing of similar firms. Therefore, tests of announcement effects are performed not only on the firm itself but also on a portfolio of related firms. Although the announcements were found to be associated with significant unit price reactions for the MLP making the announcement, the price reaction for similar firms was small, indicating only weak support for intraindustry information transfers. Résumé. L'auteur examine l'incidence des avis de réduction des déclarations de dividendes sur le prix des titres des Master Limited Partnerships (MLP). Pour mettre en marché les titres de ces entreprises, dont les bénéfices ne sont pas assujeuis à l'impôt fédéral américain sur le revenu, on fait valoir leur taux de rendement élevé. Comme la plupart des MLP œuvrent dans un secteur d'activité unique, celui des ressources naturelles, les réductions de dividendes opérées par une entreprise en raison de facteurs qui touchent l'ensemble du secteur risquent d'avoir une incidence sur le cours des titres d'entreprises similaires. C'est pourquoi l'auteur vérifie l'incidence de ces réductions non seulement sur les titres de l'entreprise qui les annonce, mais aussi sur un portefeuille de titres d'entreprises apparentées. Bien que l'annonce d'une réduction provoque d'importants changements dans le cours unitaire des titres de la MLP qui en est l'auteur, les changements enregistrés dans le cours des titres des entreprises similaires sont minces, ce qui indique un faible dispositif de transfert d'information à l'intérieur du secteur.

Safe harbor lease law, Taxation, Asset restructuring, Stock prices

[In 1981, Congress enacted a "safe harbor" lease law that permitted firms to sell unneeded tax depreciation deductions and tax credits to other firms. During the effective life of the law, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) did not establish reporting or disclosure requirements for firms entering the safe harbor transactions. Because of this, many policies were followed. This paper examines the impact of this lack of reporting and disclosure guidance on the comparability and interpretability of financial statements across firms involved in leasing. This study provides examples of problems the FASB might need to address when analyzing changes under the new tax bill.]

This study examines the unit (stock) price and volume behavior of master limited partnerships (MLP) around the ex-dividend day. Since the dividends of MLPs are not taxable to the unitholder, tax based hypotheses predict no abnormal unit movements around the ex-day. Significant positive excess returns and volume are found before the ex-dividend day, and significant negative excess returns are found on the ex-dividend day. The findings which are not significantly impacted by the Tax Reform Act of 1986 suggest ex-day stock movements are not solely a function of investor marginal tax rates or corporate trading behavior.

ABSTRACT This study examines the unit (stock) price and volume behavior of master limited partnerships (MLP) around the ex‐dividend day. Since the dividends of MLPs are not taxable to the unitholder, tax based hypotheses predict no abnormal unit movements around the ex‐day. Significant positive excess returns and volume are found before the ex‐dividend day, and significant negative excess returns are found on the ex‐dividend day. The findings which are not significantly impacted by the Tax Reform Act of 1986 suggest ex‐day stock movements are not solely a function of investor marginal tax rates or corporate trading behavior.

This study examines the unit (stock) price and volume behavior of master limited partnerships around the ex-dividend day. Since the dividends of master limited partnerships are not taxable to the unitholder, tax-based hypotheses predict no abnormal unit movements around the ex-day. Significant positive excess returns and volume are found before the ex-dividend day, and significant negative excess returns are found on the ex-dividend day. The findings, which are not significantly impacted by the Tax Reform Act of 1986, suggest ex-day stock movements are not solely a function of investor marginal tax rates or corporate trading behavior.

[We test the empirical implications of several models of IPO underpricing. Consistent with the winner's-curse hypothesis, we show that in markets where investors know a priori that they do not have to compete with informed investors, IPOs are not underpriced. We also show that IPOs underwritten by reputable investment banks experience significantly less underpricing and perform significantly better in the long run. We do not find empirical support for the signaling models that try to explain why firms underprice. In fact, we find that (1) firms that underprice more return to the reissue market less frequently, and for lesser amounts, than firms that underprice less, and (2) firms that underprice less experience higher earnings and pay higher dividends, contrary to the models' predictions.]

ABSTRACT We examine the investment characteristics of firms electing to enter bankruptcy, between 1973 and 1982. Comparisons are made before and after the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978. Our results indicate that the 1978 Act had no significant impact on bankruptcy decisions or resolutions for actively traded firms. Trading in bankrupt firms' securities is becoming more common, but no abnormal returns appear to be available. Systematic risk does not change significantly with the filing of bankruptcy, but there is a significant increase in return variance. The financial markets also react to various announcements of stages in the reorganization process.

John A. Elliott, Wayne H. Shaw, Write-Offs As Accounting Procedures to Manage Perceptions, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 26, Studies on Management's Ability and Incentives to Affect the Timing and Magnitude of Accounting Accruals (1988), pp. 91-119