This study examines how government procurement impacts firms’ environmental disclosures and whether they have tangible effects. Using a triple-difference research design that exploits the exogenous increase in federal funding allocations to counties based on population census revisions, we find that firms with high exposure to government contracts significantly increase climate disclosure following expanded procurement opportunities. We also document that enhanced disclosure is characterized by a positive tone that emphasizes firms’ green investment and commitment to climate adaptation. The effect is more pronounced in counties with a greater increase in procurement volume and when firms have lower ex ante sustainability performance. Finally, we find firms that increase climate disclosure are more likely to earn government contracts, and they undertake real actions by reducing toxic emissions and enhancing the development of green products. Overall our results suggest government procurement promotes corporate climate responsibility by incentivizing firms to undertake climate mitigation actions.

Research finds that climate disasters have had minimal effects on banks’ performance to date, and it has devoted limited attention to how banks shape societal exposure to the disasters. This study addresses this puzzle and gap. Examining the share price reactions of banks affected by billion-dollar disasters from 1994–2024, we find that on average these banks lost market value around the disasters exceeding 10 percent of the estimated damages, with this percentage more than doubling during the sample period. We next show that banks’ county-level mortgage lending is positively associated with property exposures to disasters and FEMA appropriations when disasters occur. Finally, we show that banks open new branches in counties that experience growth in socially advantaged population, especially counties with high climate risks. Given accelerating climate change, property-casualty insurers backing away from climate-risky counties, and FEMA’s uncertain status, our evidence highlights growing climate-related costs for banks and society.

U sing lenders who become members of the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) as an exogenous shock, we examine whether and how lenders’ commitment to transparent climate-related disclosures affects borrowers’ environmental performance. We find that borrowers of TCFD-member lenders, relative to control firms, significantly improve their environmental performance after the TCFD launch. Lenders’ disclosure commitments influence borrowers through credit rationing and monitoring. Specifically, polluting borrowers face higher borrowing costs, reduced access to credit, and greater incorporation of environmental action covenants in loan agreements. Additionally, polluting borrowers of TCFD-member lenders experience heightened financial constraints. Finally, borrowers of TCFD-member lenders are more likely to adopt the TCFD framework for climate-related disclosure after the TCFD establishment. Together, these findings illuminate the role of lenders in driving corporate environmental performance improvement through their commitment to transparent climate-related disclosures.