Knowledge that Transforms

Reviews the book "Expenses and Profits of Limited Price Variety Chains in 1937," by Stanley F. Teele.

Reviews the book "Managerial Control," by John G. Glover and Coleman L. Maze.

Abstract It is now generally accepted that double-entry bookkeeping is by no means the invention of one man nor the product of a single generation, but that it is the result of a long evolution. Even today, it progresses under the spur of actual needs, and its development is the result of a persistent effort to adapt the accounting methods to the growing requirements of business enterprise. Its evolution in the past has been dominated by the same commanding necessity of adaptation. There is, however, still one dark spot in the history of accounting. Although it can be perceived fairly well how the double-entry system developed, once the basic principle of duality and equilibrium was laid down, it is hard to understand how it came into being. As a matter of fact, the specialists of the history of bookkeeping have all tried to solve the problem and to offer some satisfactory explanation. Owing to a lack of source material, these solutions, however, are based mainly on conjectural reasoning rather than on factual evidence. Three factors seem to have contributed to the development of accounting: credit, partnership, and agency.

Reviews the book "World Economic Survey, Sixth Year, 1936-37."

Abstract The article focuses on test for principles. The word principles has been extensively used by both accounting practitioners and academic writers with little discrimination in the context between the truths of accountancy and the practices of accountants. In a treatise for educational use, inclusiveness may be necessary so that accounting will be presented as a whole. But the student cannot be well trained in clear thinking unless the elements out of which the subject matter is constructed are clearly distinguished one from another. There is a growing movement, in the interest of clear thinking and orderly practice, toward the formulation of concise propositions regarding accounting. Each of these aspects is complementary to the other, and both need to be held in mind for true comprehension. But it is a task of some moment to classify numerous propositions as either rules or principles, for none of them can be both. To do so one needs more than dictionary definitions. A test by which to recognize a proposition as a statement of accounting principle is needed. Those propositions which do not meet the test may be useful statements of accounting rules.

Reviews the book "Cost Accounting," by W.B. Lawrence.

Reviews the book "Introduction to Accounting," by Dallas S. Bolan.

Reviews the book "Essentials of the Mathematics of Investment," by Paul R. Rider.

Reviews the book "The Preparation of Reports--Scientific, Engineering, Administrative, Business," by Ray P. Baker and Almonte C. Howell.

Abstract In considering the effect of a stock dividend upon its recipient it is first necessary to inquire into the fundamental meaning of the terms "income" and "capital," and the distinctions, if any, between income to the corporation and income to stockholders. With a working understanding of these matters in mind, it will then be possible to discuss the nature of stock dividends from the recipient's standpoint. Discussion of economic matters is frequently confused by a failure to distinguish between interpretations of a particular phenomenon in business practice and the underlying facts and principles of the phenomenon as interpreted by economists. The difference lies in the theoretical level at which underlying facts and principles necessarily are kept in the economist's analysis. The theoretical level is used because the assumptions upon which the reasoning rests may not obtain to the degree required for its validation on the practical level. And the economist's assumptions fall short of conformity to reality because they are virtually impossible of full verification.