Knowledge that Transforms

To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
2204 results ✕ Clear filters

Officers of the Society

Journal of Labor Economics 2022 40(3), iv-v
Previous articleNext article FreeOfficers of the SocietyPDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMore2022–24 Board of Officers of the SocietyPresident: Thomas Lemieux, University of British ColumbiaPresident-Elect: Kathryn Shaw, Stanford UniversityVice President: Chinhui Juhn, University of Houston2021–23: Barbara Petrongolo, University of Oxford2021–23: Hilary Hoynes, University of California, Berkeley2022–24: Liz Cascio, Dartmouth University2022–24: Fabian Lange, McGill UniversityKevin Lang, Boston University and the Journal of Labor Economics, ex officioFellows of the Society of Labor EconomistsDate elected is in parentheses. Fellows with no date are initial fellows.John Abowd (2007)Katharine Abraham (2007)Daron Acemoglu (2007)George Akerlof (2007)Joseph Altonji (2006)Joshua Angrist (2006)Orley AshenfelterDavid Autor (2009)Ann Bartel (2019)Gary Becker*Marianne Bertrand (2012)Dan Black (2019)Sandra Black (2016)Rebecca Blank (2006)Francine BlauRichard Blundell (2006)George Borjas (2004)John Bound (2007)Charles Brown (2006)Kenneth Burdett (2008)Glen Cain (2005)*David Card (2005)Kerwin Kofi Charles (2017)Pierre-Andre Chiappori (2009)Janet Currie (2006)Steven J. Davis (2015)John DiNardo (2013)*Christian Dustmann (2017)Ron EhrenbergHenry Farber (2004)Nicole Fortin (2020)Richard FreemanRoland G. Fryer Jr. (2015)Victor Fuchs (2005)Robert Gibbons (2008)Claudia Goldin (2005)Reuben Gronau (2004)Robert Hall (2006)John Haltiwanger (2013)Dan HamermeshEric Hanushek (2006)James Heckman (2004)V. Joseph Hotz (2018)Caroline Hoxby (2015)Hilary Hoynes (2018)George Johnson (2007)*Chinhui Juhn (2019)Lawrence Kahn (2008)Lawrence Katz (2005)Michael P. Keane (2021)John Kennan (2008)Francis Kramarz (2019)Alan Krueger (2006)*Robert LaLonde (2017)*Kevin Lang (2010)Richard Layard (2008)Edward Lazear*Thomas Lemieux (2009)Shelly Lundberg (2008)Stephen Machin (2011)W. Bentley MacLeod (2012)Thomas MaCurdy (2006)Alan Manning (2014)Alexandre Mas (2019)Marjorie McElroy (2008)Costas Meghir (2011)Robert Michael (2010)Jacob Mincer (2004)*Magne Mogstad (2021)Robert Moffitt (2006)Enrico Moretti (2014)Dale Mortensen (2005)*Richard Murnane (2013)Kevin Murphy (2005)Derek Neal (2008)Steve Nickell (2007)Walter Oi (2004)*Paul Oyer (2021)John PencavelChristopher Pissarides (2008)Robert Pollak (2005)Canice Prendergast (2013)Melvin Reder (2004)*Mark Rosenzweig (2007)Cecila Rouse (2021)Kjell Salvanes (2021)Kathryn Shaw (2008)Rob Shimer (2012)James Smith (2005)Jeffrey Smith (2016)Gary Solon (2008)Frank Stafford (2007)Chris Taber (2010Petra Todd (2011)Robert Topel (2004)John Van Reenen (2013)Yoram Weiss (2005)Finis Welch*Robert Willis (2004)New Fellows Elected in 2022Nick BloomJenny HuntPat KlineLance LochnerJesse RothsteinNotes*Deceased. Previous articleNext article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Journal of Labor Economics Volume 40, Number 3July 2022 Published for the Society of Labor Economists, Economics Research Center/ NORC Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/721000 Views: 424Total views on this site © 2022 The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.

SOLE 2023/28th Annual Meeting

Journal of Labor Economics 2022 40(3), iii-iii
Previous articleNext article FreeSOLE 2023/28th Annual Meeting Call for PapersPDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreThe Society of Labor Economists will hold its 28th Annual Meeting on May 12–13, 2023, at the Sonesta Philadelphia Rittenhouse in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.More details about the meeting and submission process will be available at https://www.sole-jole.org. Previous articleNext article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Journal of Labor Economics Volume 40, Number 3July 2022 Published for the Society of Labor Economists, Economics Research Center/ NORC Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/720999 Views: 1090Total views on this site © 2022 The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.

H. Gregg Lewis Prize

Journal of Labor Economics 2022 40(3), viii-ix
Previous articleNext article FreeH. Gregg Lewis PrizePDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreThe H. Gregg Lewis Prize for the best paper published in the Journal of Labor Economics during 2020–21 has been awarded to Jennifer Doleac and Benjamin Hansen for “The Unintended Consequences of ‘Ban the Box’: Statistical Discrimination and Employment Outcomes When Criminal Histories are Hidden,” which appeared in the April 2020 issue of the Journal.Individuals with criminal records are severely disadvantaged in the labor market, and black men with such histories are particularly disadvantaged. Various US jurisdictions have adopted ban the box (BTB) policies intended to prevent employers from using criminal histories to screen applicants, in part to reduce racial disparities. However, when employers cannot access such information, they may rely on correlates of criminal history, most notably race and sex, thereby increasing racial and ethnic disparities. The authors use variation in the timing of state and local BTB policies to identify the effect of such policies on the employment of young black and Hispanic men with less than a college degree. In their preferred specification, they find that BTB reduces the employment of young, low-skilled black men by 3.4 percentage points and young, low-skilled Hispanic men by 2.3 percentage points. Strikingly, these effects are smaller when the labor market is tighter and when the respective minority group comprises a larger proportion of the labor force. In addition, the authors find evidence that employment shifts toward groups with a lower proportion of individuals with criminal records: older black men, older Hispanic women, and white men. The authors argue that their results are consistent with employers engaging in statistical discrimination when they cannot obtain information directly on job applications.The committee selected this paper because the empirical work is well executed, the results have clear policy implications, and the article is among the most highly cited of those published in JOLE in the last two years. The authors’ analysis shows the importance of fully considering the implications of social policies on all affected individuals. BTB policies are intended to help the ex-offender population acquire jobs but may instead put a larger minority population at an employment disadvantage by increasing employers’ reliance on statistical discrimination. The paper goes beyond estimating the causal effects of such policies by investigating how they vary regionally and with local labor market conditions. The authors also examine which groups benefit when employers substitute away from younger, low-skilled black and Hispanic males, and they find the evidence consistent with statistical rather than taste-based discrimination. This paper contributes to an important literature showing how policies that suppress information (e.g., criminal records, drug tests, credit histories, health status, educational testing, and employment histories) can have unintended consequences. In recent decades, the quantity of information about individuals that is stored and made publicly available has grown massively. Policies regulating access to and use of these data are likely to be increasingly important. Previous articleNext article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Journal of Labor Economics Volume 40, Number 3July 2022 Published for the Society of Labor Economists, Economics Research Center/ NORC Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/720635 Views: 1218Total views on this site © 2022 The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.