The originate-to-distribute (OTD) model, in which the originators of mortgages sell or securitize the mortgages to third parties, likely contributed to the 2008 financial crisis. Auditors were blamed for permitting clients to understate the risks of the model in their financial reports, fostering undisciplined lending. We investigate whether public audit oversight influences OTD lending by promoting more vigilant audits of the financial reports of originators. Using a difference-in-differences design prior to the financial crisis, we find reduced OTD lending by banks after the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) criticizes their auditors’ audits of financial reports regarding OTD transactions. The reduction is greater for banks with poorer risk controls and stronger incentives to manage earnings. We also find a reduction in gains on loan sales and securitizations. The results suggest that PCAOB inspections can help discipline OTD lending, a real effect of public audit oversight in the United States.

Do industries use advertising strategically when subject to the threat of political costs? Communication via advertising can assuage public concerns, which, in turn, reduces the incentives for elected officials to impose regulations on the industry. We identify expected political costs using cases of repeated industry testimony at congressional hearings. To disentangle strategic advertising in response to the threat of political costs from advertising for other reasons (e.g., reputation building or to generate sales), we exploit the fact that only politicians overseeing industry-relevant hearings can impose costs on a given industry. We find that subsequent to these hearings, affected industries increase their advertising by 132% more in the electorates of the politicians overseeing the hearings, relative to the increase in the electorates of other politicians. The strategic increase in advertising is magnified in the electorates served by the most senior politicians on the committees and those with the most politically engaged citizens. The increase is also pronounced in election years, when the hearings are longer, contain more negative language, or include a higher proportion of legislation-related words. Moreover, our results are not driven by politicians’ decisions to serve on committees relevant to their local-area firms. In sum, our findings provide novel evidence about corporate communication with non-investor stakeholders.

This paper examines the consequences of powerful political connections for local governments. We find that governments located within the constituencies of, and thus connected to, powerful congressional members reduce their stewardship over public resources. Using plausibly exogenous declines in the power of congressional representation, we show that the effect is causal. To better understand why connected local governments can reduce stewardship, we study electoral characteristics. Our findings suggest that the increased resources that come with powerful congressional representation allow local‐government officials to reduce stewardship without material adverse effects on their reelection prospects. In sum, we provide evidence of a cost of political connections: they weaken local governments' incentives to act in a socially optimal manner.

ABSTRACT Over three-quarters of U.S. taxpayers receive federal tax refunds, largely due to income tax over-withholding. This study explores how over-withholding impacts investments by comparing individuals’ investment behavior following wage receipts and tax refunds. We find a significantly higher marginal propensity to invest out of wages than refunds, suggesting that over-withholding, which alters the labeling and timing of income, meaningfully influences financial decision-making. Our cross-sectional analysis indicates that the differential investment rates are more pronounced for individuals with automatic investment setups and lower financial sophistication. The difference cannot be fully explained by alternative explanations such as lack of awareness, fixed dollar investment goals, timing differences between wages and refunds, uncertainty of refunds, transaction costs, or the perception of refunds as additional windfall income. Our findings underscore the importance of considering behavioral factors in the formulation of tax policies and contribute to the accounting literature that examines taxes and investment behavior.