To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
2 results ✕ Clear filters

Are embedded calls valuable? Evidence from agency bonds

Journal of Banking & Finance 2007 31(1), 57-79
This paper examines the call option values embedded in callable agency bonds. For FHLB, FNMA, and SLMA bonds, call value estimates range from 1.23% of par to 1.47% on average, which are between those for the treasury and corporate debt securities. FHLMC bonds, on the other hand, have an average call value estimate of 2.85%. Call values are significantly larger for bonds with a longer remaining maturity and greater default risk. Most interestingly, call values in the call protection period are significantly larger than those in the callable period except for the SLMA bonds, whereas previous studies on corporate debt find no significant difference in call values between these two periods. In general, call value exhibits a downward trend over time as the callable bond approaches maturity. Also, call value is inversely related to the level of interest rates. Interest rate drops are usually accompanied by an increase in call values. An analysis of the determinants of call values suggests the following conclusions. First, call values are negatively related to short-term interest rates and the slope of the yield curve, and positively related to coupon rate and remaining maturity. Second, bonds with a greater amount of call protection have smaller call values, which is in contrast with the finding in a previous study on corporate debt that call protection period has little effect on call value.

Growth Opportunities and the Choice of Leverage, Debt Maturity, and Covenants

Journal of Finance 2007 62(2), 697-730
We investigate the effect of growth opportunities in a firm's investment opportunity set on its joint choice of leverage, debt maturity, and covenants. Using a database that contains detailed debt covenant information, we provide large‐sample evidence of the incidence of covenants in public debt and construct firm‐level indices of bondholder covenant protection. We find that covenant protection is increasing in growth opportunities, debt maturity, and leverage. We also document that the negative relation between leverage and growth opportunities is significantly attenuated by covenant protection, suggesting that covenants can mitigate the agency costs of debt for high growth firms.