To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
2 results ✕ Clear filters

Skewed Bidding in Pay-per-Action Auctions for Online Advertising

American Economic Review 2009 99(2), 441-447
Online search as well as keyword-based contextual advertising on third-party publishers is primarily priced using pay-per-click (PPC): advertisers pay only when a consumer clicks on the advertisement. Slots for advertisements are auctioned, and per-click bids are weighted by the probability of a click given that the advertisement is displayed (the “click-through rate”) in addition to other factors. The PPC method allows the advertising platform (e.g. Google) to bundle together otherwise heterogeneous items (impressions on different positions on a search page, on different search phrases sharing common “keywords,” and on different publishers) into more homogeneous units, simplifying the advertiser's bidding problem. However, PPC pricing has some drawbacks. First, all clicks are not created equal: clicks on a Paris, France hotel website that is displayed on a search for Paris Hilton may result in lower profit conditional on the click. Second, for infrequently searched phrases on search engines or small content providers, it is difficult for the advertiser to accurately estimate conversion rates, increasing the risk and monitoring costs for the advertiser and diminishing their incentives to advertise broadly (indeed, on contextual networks, the advertising platform may not even provide the advertiser with sufficient accounting data about where the advertisements were displayed to allow the advertiser to distinguish sources of clicks, and the publisher mix may change on an ongoing basis.) Third, the problem of click fraud is fairly pervasive: when publishers receive a share of advertising revenue, advertisers place a single bid applying to many publishers, and revenue

The Impact of Media Censorship: 1984 or Brave New World?

American Economic Review 2019 109(6), 2294-2332 open access
Media censorship is a hallmark of authoritarian regimes. We conduct a field experiment in China to measure the effects of providing citizens with access to an uncensored internet. We track subjects’ media consumption, beliefs regarding the media, economic beliefs, political attitudes, and behaviors over 18 months. We find four main results: (i) free access alone does not induce subjects to acquire politically sensitive information; (ii) temporary encouragement leads to a persistent increase in acquisition, indicating that demand is not permanently low; (iii) acquisition brings broad, substantial, and persistent changes to knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and intended behaviors; and (iv) social transmission of information is statistically significant but small in magnitude. We calibrate a simple model to show that the combination of low demand for uncensored information and the moderate social transmission means China’s censorship apparatus may remain robust to a large number of citizens receiving access to an uncensored internet.