Price discrimination emerges as the unique equilibrium outcome in games with either simultaneous choice of policy and price or sequential choice in which firms may commit first to uniform mill pricing before the actual market stage. Our results are used to analyze some common business practices that arise in geographical pricing, like the basing point system, and in the pricing of varieties or options from a base product in a product differentiation context.

Lack of market transparency can impair the liquidity provision of nonstandard liquidity suppliers and make liquidity demand increasing in illiquidity. This can yield strategic complementarities and induce multiple equilibria. Then an initial dearth of liquidity may degenerate into a liquidity rout (as in a “flash crash”), and traders faced with the largest cost of trading are those trading more intensely at equilibrium. An increase in order flow transparency and/or in the mass of dealers who are in the market at all times has a positive impact on total welfare.

The strategic incentives, with respect to the choice of price policy in spatial competition, are analyzed in a duopoly model. Price discrimination emerges as the unique equilibriu m outcome in games with either simultaneous choice of policy and pric e or sequential choice where firms may commit first to uniform mill p ricing before the actual market stage. Nevertheless, profits may be h igher with uniform pricing. The authors' models are applied to analyz e some common business practices that arise in geographical pricing, like the basing point system, and in the pricing of varieties or opti ons from a base product in a product-differentiation context.