To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
10 results ✕ Clear filters

Beyond the Algebra of Explanation: HOV for the Technology Age

American Economic Review 2000 90(2), 145-149
It is hard to believe that factor-endowments theory could offer an adequate explanation of international trade patterns. While the theory adequately predicts Saudi Arabian oil exports, it hardly seems appropriate for explaining the revolutionary impact of new technologies on world trade. Yet to take this position is to misunderstand the thrust of recent empirical research in international trade, research that is giving shape to a new generation of Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek (HOV) thinking. The core of this new thinking is a class of HOV predictions that allow for international differences in technology and choice of techniques. The literature is in the process of rapid evolution. As a result, the key questions tend to get lost. There have been three of them. First, what empirical regularities account for the poor performance of the HOV model? Second, are there alternative assumptions about technology that lead to better test results for the model? Both of these are interesting questions, but they hardly constitute an end point for understanding the impacts of international trade. As Edward E. Leamer (1993 p. 439) pointed out, [E]conomists ought to abandon the idea that models are either true or false in favor of the notion that models are sometimes useful and sometimes misleading. The third and most important question is whether the HOV model provides a useful framework for thinking about international technology differences. In spite of the defects of the model, the answer is a definite ''yes.9

Which Entrepreneurs are Coachable and Why?

American Economic Review 2017 107(5), 312-316
Is coachability a usable concept for startups? Using a dataset on high-growth startups in a prominent university incubator, we show that firm characteristics do predict which firms are likely to follow advice but that these “coachable” firms are not more likely to achieve positive outcomes. The reason is that advice may be rejected either because the firm is stubborn and uncoachable, or because the firm possesses capabilities related to the advice which is hard for outsiders to observe.

Trade, Migration, and Productivity: A Quantitative Analysis of China

American Economic Review 2019 109(5), 1843-1872
We study how goods- and labor-market frictions affect aggregate labor productivity in China. Combining unique data with a general equilibrium model of internal and international trade, and migration across regions and sectors, we quantify the magnitude and consequences of trade and migration costs. The costs were high in 2000, but declined afterward. The decline accounts for 36 percent of the aggregate labor productivity growth between 2000 and 2005. Reductions in internal trade and migration costs are more important than reductions in external trade costs. Despite the decline, migration costs are still high and potential gains from further reform are large.

Is Wikipedia Biased?

American Economic Review 2012 102(3), 343-348
This study empirically examines whether Wikipedia has a neutral point of view. It develops a method for measuring the slant of 28 thousand articles about US politics. In its earliest years, Wikipedia's political entries lean Democrat on average. The slant diminishes during Wikipedia's decade of experience. This change does not arise primarily from revision of existing articles. Most articles arrive with a slant, and most articles change only mildly from their initial slant. The overall slant changes due to the entry of articles with opposite slants, leading toward neutrality for many topics, not necessarily within specific articles.

Why Do Payment Card Networks Charge Proportional Fees?

American Economic Review 2011 101(4), 1575-1590
This paper explains why payment card networks charge fees that are proportional to the transaction values instead of charging fixed per-transaction fees. We show that, when card networks and merchants both have market power, card networks earn higher profits by charging proportional fees. It is also shown that competition among merchants reduces card networks' gains from using proportional fees relative to fixed per-transaction fees. Merchants are found to earn lower profits under proportional fees, whereas consumer utility and social welfare are higher. Our welfare results are then evaluated with respect to the current regulatory policy debates.

Group Size and Incentives to Contribute: A Natural Experiment at Chinese Wikipedia

American Economic Review 2011 101(4), 1601-1615
The literature on the private provision of public goods suggests an inverse relationship between incentives to contribute and group size. We find, however, that after an exogenous reduction of group size at Chinese Wikipedia, the nonblocked contributors decrease their contributions by 42.8 percent on average. We attribute the cause to social effects: contributors receive social benefits that increase with both the amount of their contributions and group size, and the shrinking group size weakens these social benefits. Consistent with our explanation, we find that the more contributors value social benefits, the more they reduce their contributions after the block.

Does Strategic Ability Affect Efficiency? Evidence from Electricity Markets

American Economic Review 2019 109(12), 4302-4342 open access
Oligopoly models of price competition predict that strategic firms exercise market power and generate inefficiencies. However, heterogeneity in firms’ strategic ability also generates inefficiencies. We study the Texas electricity market where firms exhibit significant heterogeneity in how they deviate from Nash equilibrium bidding. These deviations, in turn, increase the cost of production. To explain this heterogeneity, we embed a cognitive hierarchy model into a structural model of bidding and estimate firms’ strategic sophistication. We find that firm size and manager education affect sophistication. Using the model, we show that mergers which increase sophistication can increase efficiency despite increasing market concentration.

The Decline of Too Big to Fail

American Economic Review 2025 115(3), 945-974
For globally systemically important banks (GSIBs) with US headquarters, we find significant reductions in market-implied probabilities of government bailout after the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), along with roughly 170 percent higher wholesale debt financing costs for these banks after controlling for insolvency risk. Since the GFC, bank creditors appear to expect much larger losses in the event that a GSIB approaches insolvency. In this sense, we estimate a decline of “too big to fail.” (G01, G12, G21, G28, G33, H81)

Liberalized Trade and Worker-Firm Matching

American Economic Review 2012 102(3), 429-434 open access
Recent theoretical analysis suggests that a reduction in the cost of exporting increases the degree of assortative matching between workers and firms in export-oriented industries. Changes that reduce the cost of imports have an ambiguous impact on matching. We combine detailed Swedish matched worker-firm data from 1995-2005 with tariff data to test these hypotheses. The data cover 94 sectors subject to international competition and include all firms with at least 20 employees. Our findings strongly support the theoretical predictions.