Knowledge that Transforms

We empirically investigate the impact of financial analysts' integrity on their information outputs and career success. Using analysts' off‐the‐job behavior, specifically their legal records, to proxy for analyst integrity, we predict and find that weak‐integrity analysts engage more in opportunistic behaviors, including “speaking in two tongues” and earnings forecast walk‐down. These analysts obtain favorable management access and make more accurate earnings forecasts. Further analyses indicate that while the market as a whole does not distinguish weak‐integrity analysts from others, sophisticated investors discount their information outputs. Weak‐integrity analysts also experience less favorable career outcomes. Our results have important implications for investors, professional bodies, employers, and regulators.

This study investigates the adoption and implications of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 842 lease accounting standards in private loan contracts. Analyzing a comprehensive sample of material loan contracts from 2011 to 2023, we document a pervasive reluctance to adopt ASC 842. Specifically, we find that for loans issued prior to, but maturing after, the standard effective date, only 41% of loans adopt the standard. For loans issued after the standard effective date, only 46% of loans adopt the standard. Our determinants analyses reveal that for loans issued prior to the effective date, the reluctance to adopt ASC 842 is associated with (1) a preference for using consistent lease classifications over time, (2) concerns about borrower opportunism, and (3) the costs of negotiating or renegotiating lease‐related loan terms within lending syndicates. In contrast, for loans issued after the effective date, only negotiation costs are associated with the reluctance to adopt. Our findings suggest that the costs of adopting ASC 842 in private loan contracts often outweigh the benefits and that contracting parties prefer a stable accounting standard environment.

We examine the impact of Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Code Section 4960 of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 on nonprofit organizations (NPOs). This section imposes a 21% excise tax on nonprofit employee compensation exceeding $1 million per covered individual. As this is an exogenous shock imposing a cost on NPOs with highly paid employees, it leads us to examine whether those employees share the newly added cost via a reduction in their compensation. Using a difference‐in‐differences analysis on data from IRS Form 990 filings for nearly 40,000 nonprofit employee‐year observations from 2015 to 2010, we find that the level of compensation, on average, increases for treated executives in the post–Section 4960 period, but at a slower rate than that of the control group of executives. These results are consistent with highly paid employees being reluctant, on average, to take a pay cut, but being more willing to accept a reduction in their rate of pay growth. Our results are robust to alternative treatment specifications and control samples, such as employees who earn more than $1 million but are not covered under Section 4960 and medical professionals who are specifically exempt from Section 4960. We also find that compensation decreases are more likely for treated employees post–Section 4960 and that replacements for treated CEOs take an even steeper pay cut post–Section 4960. Additionally, we observe increased turnover for treated CEOs post–Section 4960, consistent with Section 4960 leading to conflicts between treated CEOs and their boards regarding the excise tax and who should bear its cost.

Auditors are required to raise potential audit issues to their supervisor's attention (i.e., to speak up). Speaking up allows supervisors to adjust audit procedures as needed to protect audit quality. We argue that the act of speaking up may not always be sufficient to protect audit quality— how auditors speak up is critical. Drawing on audit voice theory (AVT), which focuses on whether auditors speak up, we consider the impact of auditors' salient goals on the tactics that auditors use when raising issues. Using a survey, multiple experiments, and an association study, we find that staff auditors with salient public service (vs. self‐serving) goals choose more quality‐enhancing voice tactics when speaking up. Importantly, however, we find that the voice‐related decisions of auditors with salient self‐serving (but not public service) goals respond to rewards for more quality‐enhancing tactics. These results support our theory that auditors approach voice differently depending on their salient goals, and they imply that supervisors can help auditors choose quality‐enhancing voice tactics even when self‐serving goals are salient. Overall, our findings test and extend AVT, identify a potential shortcoming of current audit standards, and suggest ways that firms can improve team communication and audit quality via recruitment strategies, team management practices, and training.

Prior research shows that borrowers are more likely to default when their banks are financially distressed, particularly where contract enforcement is weak. We examine whether regulatory intervention in the form of Prompt Corrective Action (PCA), which seeks to improve bank health through enhanced monitoring, reverses such defaults. To address this question, we exploit the bright‐line entry thresholds in India's PCA regime using a regression discontinuity framework. We first show that such defaults exist in India. Our main result is that PCA intervention significantly reduces such defaults. The result is robust to variation in methodology and alternative definitions of bank health. Our evidence suggests that PCA reduces such defaults by credibly signaling to borrowers the likely restoration of bank health and continuity of lending relationships. Its effectiveness was reinforced by an earlier regulatory reform that improved the timeliness of loan‐loss provisioning, enhancing the credibility of enforcement. Overall, our findings suggest that PCA, when underpinned by credible financial reporting, can serve as an effective policy tool to curb strategic defaults.

We investigate whether foreign tax holiday participation among US multinational companies is associated with offshoring US jobs and other domestic investment activities. We find that foreign tax holiday participation is associated with (1) an increase in offshoring US jobs and (2) a decrease in domestic investment, as proxied by changes in the number of employees, capital expenditures, and R&D activity. Furthermore, we find evidence suggesting that the association between targeted, temporary tax incentives provided by foreign tax holidays and firms' domestic activities is stronger among firms with a smaller foreign presence and is distinct from the impact of foreign statutory tax rate changes. Overall, the results of this study increase our understanding of the firm‐level consequences of foreign tax holiday participation, the influence of various tax incentive structures on the allocation of firm resources, and the potential consequences of international tax competition.

This study examines whether the ideological orientation of the audit partner and audit committee members—defined as their personal belief systems and inclinations, including their attitude toward risk, ambiguity, and novelty—has an impact on engagement partner selection and the effectiveness of oversight in the financial reporting process. Drawing on prior evidence that the two main US political parties reflect different ideologies, we hand‐collect political donation data to construct ideological scores for audit partners and audit committee members. Our findings highlight several intriguing relationships. First, audit committees are more likely to select an ideologically dissimilar partner. Second, greater ideological dissimilarity between these two key monitors is associated with higher financial reporting quality. The effects of financial reporting quality are most pronounced among more effective audit committees and when audit partners have longer tenure with the client. These effects are incremental to both social connections between the audit partner and audit committee and to ideological differences between these parties and the CEO and CFO. Overall, the results support the notion that ideological dissimilarity between audit partners and audit committees can foster effective oversight of the financial reporting process. Moreover, ideological dissimilarity appears to be a useful and rational cue in audit partner selection decisions.

Corporate tax avoidance is a recurring focus of policy‐makers, the media, activist groups, and researchers. This focus often centers on multinational enterprises' (MNEs) use of tax havens, with a wide body of research utilizing MNEs' tax haven use as evidence of corporate tax avoidance activities. However, the common assumption that MNEs operate in tax havens only for tax avoidance purposes overlooks the role tax havens play as homes for captive insurance entities, which allow firms to secure “self” insurance coverage but do not provide obvious differential federal tax benefits. When we remove the effect of captives on tax haven–based measures, we observe a roughly threefold increase in the magnitude of tax savings specifically associated with haven noncaptive activity. We document that nonfinancial firms' use of captive insurance occurs in approximately 11% of firm‐years and spans nearly all Fama–French 49 industries. We construct a haven captive use determinants model, with strong discriminatory power and compelling out‐of‐sample corroboration tests, that future research can employ to account for firms' use of haven captives. Our findings underscore the importance of separating captive and noncaptive‐related haven activities.

We examine the effects of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act's (TCJA) interest deduction limitation on suppliers. Using a difference‐in‐differences design, we find that suppliers with customers subject to the limitation (“affected suppliers”) report increased accounts receivable of between 11.2% and 14.9% relative to their pre‐TCJA average accounts receivable. Using a triple differences design, we provide more granular evidence by documenting that the limitation's effects on affected suppliers' accounts receivable are driven by suppliers with customers that report increased trade credit use (i.e., higher accounts payable). In cross‐sectional analyses, we find that the effects are stronger when suppliers are smaller, have higher peer product similarity, operate in industries with low entry barriers, or are in the early stage of their life cycle, consistent with suppliers with weaker bargaining power providing more trade credit to customers compared to other suppliers. Turning to supplier consequences of increased accounts receivable, we find that affected suppliers' days sales outstanding and operating cycles increase. Next, we use path analyses to find that affected suppliers experience lower cash flows and higher risks due to their increased accounts receivable. Overall, our study provides evidence that the interest deduction limitation yielded externalities on affected firms' supply chains.

In this study, we examine how achievement‐related tendencies are expressed in the professional auditing context, particularly through the interplay between the CEO and the audit partner. We use the facial width‐to‐height ratio (fWHR), a stable morphological trait widely applied in prior research, as a proxy for achievement drive. Using a sample of US audit partners from 2016 to 2019, we find that higher achievement drive is associated with enhanced audit quality, evidenced by fewer restatements and lower abnormal accruals. Auditors with higher achievement drive are also more likely to become industry experts, attain leadership positions, and achieve partnership status more quickly. Importantly, we find that high‐achievement‐drive audit partners are more inclined to assert dominance in negotiations, particularly when working with equally driven CEOs, leading to improved audit quality. Overall, our findings suggest that, when activated in auditing contexts, achievement‐oriented tendencies, as proxied by fWHR, are linked to higher audit quality.