Reformulating marginal productivity theory by replacing productivity with respect to commodities with productivity with respect to persons and then defining perfectly competitive equilibrium as an allocation at which each person receives the marginal product of his/her contribution called a no-surplus allocation there emerges a competitive theory of price determination. Characterizations of no-surplus allocations are given in models with a nonatomic continuum of agents and an infinite-dimensional commodity space. Comparisons between the no-surplus and Walrasian equilibrium definitions of competitive equilibrium are made and some sufficient conditions are obtained for the existence of a no-surplus allocation.

A pairwise trading process is formulated subject to conditions of nonnegativity of traders' holdings and quid pro quo. It is shown that that: (i) There is a centralized procedure that achieves the equilibrium allocation for an arbitrary economy. (ii) It is not in general possible to find a decentralized procedure that achieves the equilibrium allocation for an arbitrary economy. (iii) In a monetary economy there is a decentralized procedure that achieves the equilibrium allocation. The usefulness of money is that it allows decentralization of the trading process.

The distinction between nonatomicity and thick markets as the source of perfect competition is examined. The authors construct a model of an imperfectly competitive economy with a nonatomic continuum of traders and a continuum of differentiated commodities for which Walrasian equilibria exist. The failure of perfect competition is identified in two ways: individuals can affect prices and the core is strictly larger than the set of Walrasian allocations. By contrast, it is shown that, when markets are physically or economically thick (or both), then individuals cannot typically affect prices and the core always coincides with the set of Walrasian allocations.