Knowledge that Transforms

Analyzes the history of entrepreneurship education and presents frameworks for the development of entrepreneurship education courses and programs. In evaluating whether entrepreneurship has become an established discipline, the following areas are considered: systematic theory and an established body of literature; authority, professional associations, and communication sanction; ethical codes and culture; and career opportunities for graduates. At the time of this study, there were at least 12 academic journals and 20 annual conferences focused on entrepreneurship. In addition career opportunities included positions with newly established firms or as entrepreneurial executives with established firms. While entrepreneurship was recognized as a discipline and a career, business and management education was slow to react. Entrepreneurship education has developed along two dimensions: the absolute number of entrepreneurship courses and the degree of integration of the entrepreneurship courses. Using these dimensions, two frameworks are presented. The first framework, a matrix of these two dimensions, identifies four optimal combinations. The second framework is built upon two paths: stages of transition in a firm and a functional approach. As entrepreneurship programs are developed, multiple alternative structures and learning mechanisms are needed to meet the needs of a variety of individuals. (SRD)