To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
161 results ✕ Clear filters

Inco Ltd.: Market Value, Fair Value, and Management Discretion

Journal of Accounting Research 2009 47(1), 179-211
We examine management discretion to decide when and how much to write down an asset, in a unique case where a tracking stock provides an observable market value for the asset. We find that, despite market evidence that Inco Ltd.'s financial statements substantially overvalued the Voisey's Bay nickel mine throughout 1997 to 2000, management chose not to write down the mine until 2002. Inco management used an independent fairness opinion to justify its December 2000 redemption of the tracking stock at 25% of its initial value, indicating almost surely that Inco management was aware of the generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) impairment. This case illustrates that GAAP's reliance on undiscounted cash flows for impairment decisions allows huge unrecorded disparities between book and market value. The management discretion exercised in this case provides a concrete example of the subjectivity inherent in fair valuation.

The Press as a Watchdog for Accounting Fraud

Journal of Accounting Research 2006 44(5), 1001-1033
This paper investigates the press's role as a monitor or “watchdog” for accounting fraud. I find that the press fulfills this role by rebroadcasting information from other information intermediaries (analysts, auditors, and lawsuits) and by undertaking original investigation and analysis. Articles based on original analysis provide new information to the markets while those that rebroadcast allegations from other intermediaries do not. Consistent with a dual role for the press, I find that business‐oriented press is more likely to undertake original analysis while nonbusiness periodicals focus primarily on rebroadcasting. I also investigate the determinates of press coverage, finding systematic biases in the types of firms and frauds for which articles are published. In general, the press covers firms and frauds that will be of interest to a broad set of readers and situations that are lower cost to identify and investigate.

Earnings Performance and Discretionary Disclosure

Journal of Accounting Research 2002 40(1), 173-204
While the influence of earnings performance on disclosure is a fundamental issue in the disclosure literature, our understanding of this influence is limited. In this paper, I examine a comprehensive set of disclosures from a sample of firms experiencing an extended period of seasonally adjusted earnings increases. I study how these firms adjust disclosure in response to earnings increases, how disclosure changes as the period of strong earnings performance nears an end and how firms disclose during a subsequent period of earnings decline. I find an increase in disclosure during the period of increased earnings. This increase is pervasive across all types of disclosure and tends to be bundled with earnings announcements. The market responds positively to this disclosure. Firms continue to disclose at a high level as they approach earnings declines. However, they shift to disclosures that focus on the positive short‐term results and do not discuss the impending decreases. While this behavior is systematic, the market does not appear to anticipate the subsequent earnings declines. Once the firms announce earnings declines, the magnitude of disclosure returns to the level provided prior to the increased earnings.

Agent Employment Horizons and Contracting Demand for Forward‐Looking Performance Measures

Journal of Accounting Research 2001 39(3), 481-494
In this paper, the principal rewards an agent’s farsighted effort both in the short and long term, with the short‐term reward based on a noisy, forward‐looking performance measure and the long‐term reward based on a potentially less noisy, trailing performance measure. The main result is that optimal contracting weights depend on the agent’s employment time horizon: the shorter the agent’s employment horizon the greater the emphasis on the forward‐looking performance measure and vice versa. This implies that contracting on forward‐looking performance measures can be valuable in mitigating any adverse long‐term effects of employees myopically focusing on short‐term trailing performance measures.