Knowledge that Transforms

Since 2011, there has been a substantial decline in the number of students graduating from college with accounting majors. We help explain this decline by empirically showing that technological advancement is associated with lower relative demand from employers for accounting majors compared to other business majors, especially finance. Specifically, corporate software investment is associated with lower relative wages and employment for accounting majors. Cross-sectional tests point to these findings resulting from differences in demand for human capital associated with specific college majors. As the wage gap between finance and accounting majors widens, fewer students subsequently choose an accounting major and more choose a finance major, consistent with selection models going back to Roy (1951). Our findings illustrate the utility of incorporating human capital demand factors into analyses of accounting labor markets and their connection to college major choice.

The municipal bond market has long been criticized for its lack of disclosure, which prior research often attributes to weak regulatory oversight. We offer another explanation: tax clienteles. Most municipal bonds are tax-exempt, and thus primarily attract high-tax retail investors, who may lack the incentive or ability to demand or monitor disclosures. In contrast, taxable bonds attract a broader investor base, including institutional investors who can demand disclosure. We find that issuers provide more continuing disclosures in years with taxable bonds outstanding relative to years without. Issuers also increase disclosures after issuing their first taxable bond and decrease disclosures after calling their last taxable bond. Exploiting a tax law change, we find that disclosures increase following plausibly exogenous increases in taxable bond issuances. Our results suggest that the tax clienteles for municipal bonds affect issuers’ disclosure practices and can inform those concerned with disclosure noncompliance in the municipal bond market.

This study investigates whether auditors incorporate investor information demand when determining key audit matter (KAM) disclosures. We measure investor information demand using a unique dataset of investor inquiries submitted through investor interactive platforms (IIPs) established by the China Securities Regulatory Commission. At the topic level, we find that auditors are more likely to disclose a given topic as a KAM when investors raise more inquiries on that topic. At the aggregate level, a higher proportion of inquiries devoted to accounting issues is associated with both a greater number of KAMs and longer KAM disclosures. Importantly, following the introduction of KAM reporting, managers’ footnote disclosures become more aligned with heightened investor inquiries, reinforcing our interpretation that the documented effects reflect auditors’ responses to investor inquiries rather than merely mirroring managerial disclosure changes. Overall, our findings suggest that auditors incorporate investor information demand into KAM disclosures.

This study investigates the practice of re-audits—where an incoming audit firm re-audits the prior year’s financial statements previously examined by a predecessor audit firm. We examine the costs and benefits of such re-audits. We find that re-audits are more likely when the risks of misstatement are high and when incoming auditors can expect to win more clients by identifying material misstatements overlooked by predecessor auditors. Our results show that incoming auditors who perform re-audits are more successful in winning new clients from predecessor auditors. Moreover, re-audits result in significantly more restatements. However, consistent with the resource-intensive nature of re-audits, we also find that they are associated with longer audit delays and higher audit fees. Overall, we conclude that re-audits have important consequences for financial statement users, incoming auditors, and predecessor auditors.

This paper investigates the relation between executive compensation and corporate tax policies, with a focus on the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA). Using a pay-performance sensitivity framework, we analyze the differing compensation rewards associated with domestic and foreign pre-tax incomes. Our findings reveal that, before the TCJA, executives received significantly higher rewards for foreign income, encouraging them to shift income abroad. The TCJA reduced this disparity, bringing rewards for domestic and foreign income into closer alignment. A cross-sectional analysis shows that firms assessing CEO performance based on after-tax income exhibit greater sensitivity to changes in tax policy, establishing the presence of a tax mechanism. Additional tests eliminate alternative nontax explanations related to protectionist trade policies and changes in foreign market growth opportunities. These results highlight the significant impact of executive incentives on corporate tax behavior and the effectiveness of tax policy reforms.