Knowledge that Transforms
To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.
Fields:
1420 results
✕ Clear filters
What director experience matters: A discussion of Donelson, Hutzler and Rhodes (2025)
The promises and pitfalls of mandated ownership transparency: A discussion of Amberger, Wilde, and Wu (2025)
Real effects of lagged guidance from prudential regulators on CECL
Cross-border investment, deterrence, and compliance effects of ownership transparency
Does antitrust enforcement against interlocking directorates impair corporate governance?
Trading of emission allowances and reporting incentives
Estimating profitability decomposition frameworks via machine learning: Implications for earnings forecasting and financial statement analysis
We find that nonlinear estimation of profitability decomposition frameworks yields more accurate out-of-sample profitability forecasts than forecasts from both a random walk and linear estimation. The improvements derive from nonlinear estimation and synergies between nonlinear estimation and profitability decomposition frameworks. We analyze three essential financial statement analysis design choices to provide insights for the practice of fundamental analysis and find robust evidence that higher levels of profitability decomposition, focusing on core items, and using up to three years of historical information improve forecast accuracy. We find that our forecasts predict returns and profitability changes before and after controlling for analyst forecasts and common asset pricing factors.
Firms’ real and reporting responses to taxation: A review
Taxation is a central economic policy tool, with governments increasingly using tax policy to stimulate local economic growth and also regulate multinational firms. We review the empirical literature that studies the effect of tax policies on firms’ investment, employment, and other real outcomes. Building on the neoclassical theory of corporate taxes and tangible investment, we propose an organizing framework for our review that captures the wide set of tax policies and firm responses examined in accounting research. This framework highlights four dimensions along which accounting scholars contribute to the literature: (i) documenting the role of financial reporting incentives as a moderating factor in firms’ real responses, (ii) studying firms’ reporting versus real responses, (iii) quantifying real effects of tax disclosure regulations, and (iv) improving measurement of firms’ tax status and proxies for investment and employment. We identify open questions for future research and suggest new international, federal, and local settings that may help uncover underlying mechanisms driving observed economic phenomena. Specifically, we encourage scholars to further distinguish firms’ reported and real responses to tax changes and improve measurement of these outcomes, especially in settings related to environmental taxation or settings in which tax avoidance and real outcomes are closely linked.