Prior research on the factors influencing the use of debt covenants restricting dividends and additional borrowing is extended by considering management incentives. When alternative incentive variables are considered separately, we find covenants have a significant, negative relation to CEO cash compensation, an insignificant relation to the value of CEO equity held, and significant positive relations to both the ratio of the value of CEO equity holdings to cash compensation and the fraction of equity held by the CEO. In two-stage simultaneous equations models, only the latter is significant when jointly considered with each of the other incentive variables.

A two-date rational expectations model is analyzed. At the first date, traders can privately acquire a costly signal that provides imperfect information about a public report that will be issued at the second date. Equilibrium characterizations are provided for the fraction of traders that become informed and the informativeness of the first-date price, as well as the price change variance and the expected trading volume at the second date. Comparative statics identify how the above variables are influenced by changes in the information content of the public report, and in particular how market phenomena at the public release date are influenced by endogenous prior information acquisition and trading in response to the forthcoming public release.

This paper provides a model in which audited reports are valuable to entrepreneurs who have private information and seek to share risks with investors. A distinctive feature of the model is that the choice of auditor and the resulting audited report provide partial information about the entrepreneur's private information, and he resolves all remaining investor uncertainty by signalling with retained ownership. The value of an audit is increasing in audit quality and the firm-specific risk faced by the entrepreneur and is a nondecreasing function of the entrepreneur's expectations about the future value of the firm.

This paper reports empirical tests of an hypothesized positive relation between audit quality and firm-specific risk that is predicted by Datar, Feltham, and Hughes' (1991) theoretical analysis of auditor choice when firms go public. Three types of proxies for ex ante firm-specific risk are used to test this relation: regression coefficients that theory relates to the firm-specific risk, ex ante proxies available from prospecti, and ex post variances in returns. Results from the first are moderately consistent with our hypothesis, while those from the latter two are either mixed or contrary.

This paper analyzes the impact of signal-to-noise-ratios and the autocorrelation of a performance measure on the principal's welfare in dynamic agencies with renegotiation. We consider the impact of changes in the persistent, transitory, and reversible components of accounting earnings on its usefulness in valuation versus contracting. Increasing the persistent components and reducing the reversible components are generally desirable for valuation, but not for contracting. Eliminating transitory components of earnings is generally desirable for valuation, but not necessarily for contracting. We discuss the contracting implications of differences in the autocorrelations of accounting earnings versus stock returns.

Indjejikian and Nanda (J. Accounting and Economics 27 (1999) 177) establish that “lack of commitment” results in an expected economic loss, relative to a long-term full-commitment contract, if there is inter-period correlation of performance measures. They attribute this loss to a “ratchet effect”. We demonstrate the following. First, their proposed equilibrium is not sustained unless there is some form of limited commitment. Second, these limited commitment assumptions need not induce a “ratchet effect”. Third, the “ratchet effect” is neither necessary nor sufficient for an expected economic loss to occur—the loss is due to the principal's inability to commit ex ante to the second-period incentive rate.