This study examines the role of activist investors in firms’ decisions to conduct open market share repurchases. Compared with firms making ordinary share repurchases, firms making activist-involved repurchases have more cash holdings, are more undervalued, experience better subsequent stock performance and similar improvements in operating performance, and eventually repurchase more shares. Moreover, repurchasing firms in which an activist investor claims to take a passive role exhibit no undervaluation, and repurchasing firms that make multiple repurchases exhibit share undervaluation only in repurchases where an activist is involved. In all, our findings suggest that activist-involvement is associated with improved corporate repurchase decisions.

By examining the post-retirement outside board seats held by former CEOs of S&P 1500 firms, we find that CEOs’ post-retirement outside board memberships are influenced by the level and the tone of media coverage given to the CEOs’ firms while the CEOs were “on the job.” These results provide evidence of a direct economic link between media coverage of CEOs’ performance today and CEOs’ future opportunity sets. These results lend support to the proposition that the media can play a role in corporate governance by influencing the value of CEOs’ human capital.