This paper examines the Reaching-for-Coupon (RFC) phenomenon in U.S. corporate bond mutual funds. We define RFC as a portfolio tilt toward higher-coupon bonds relative to peers with similar yields. Using detailed bond-level holdings data from 2002–2018, we construct a novel fund-level RFC measure and show that high-RFC funds attract larger inflows, particularly in low-interest-rate environments. Crucially, investor flows into RFC funds are less sensitive to poor performance, leading to a less concave flow–performance relationship and mitigating redemption-driven fragility. These altered flow dynamics strengthen managerial incentives to take risk. Moreover, compared to Reaching-for-Yield (RFY) funds, RFC funds provide more stable income streams and are less exposed to credit downgrades. Our results demonstrate that RFC captures a distinct channel through which income-driven investor demand shapes risk-taking and fragility in bond markets.

We show that a bank's knowledge of an industry developed through its loan portfolio facilitates the bank's credit provision to other firms in that industry. This effect works beyond the bank's private information about the focal firm and is consistent with a cross information production where experience with other firms from a similar background reduces information asymmetry on the firm concerned. To tackle endogeneity, we develop an instrument for a bank's expertise in an industry based on historical, natural, and regulatory conditions. We provide further evidence using the 2007 housing market crash as a laboratory. We find that banks hit by the shock rebalance loan allocations to buffer borrowers in their expertise industries from a credit crunch. The effect of industry expertise is more pronounced for opaque firms and firms facing foreign competition pressure. Our findings suggest a spillover effect or economies of scale in banks’ information production. It helps explain the cost efficiency of financial intermediaries relative to direct lending and why, beyond relationship considerations, firms may prefer some banks over others.

Ameliorating global warming has been touted as one of the most pressing issues of our time. We investigate whether there are mutual fund families that purposefully decrease their portfolios’ exposure to greenhouse gas emissions, and find families that sign the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) have significantly lower portfolio emissions after signing the initiative than do non-signatory families. There are two mechanisms via which this reduction occurs: access to the resources offered by the PRI (networks, information, education, etc.), and families with pro-environmental stakeholders. Families that reduce their emissions experience significantly increased fund flow.

Arthur Andersen’s reputation was tarnished following news that its Houston office had shredded documents related to the auditing of energy giant Enron. Earlier studies documented widespread spillover of the reputation effect, suggesting a strong commonality in Big 5 audit practices. We examine whether the market is more discriminating in its assessments. We focus on the roles industry specialization of auditors and the geography of clients’ audit offices play in accounting for the contagion. Our results are supportive of investors who differentiate audit practices by industry and who account for the location of the specific office where the audit work is done. We find that losses suffered by energy firms or firms located close to Houston are equivalent to approximately 90% of the aggregate abnormal losses suffered by Big 5 clients. Our evidence suggests the possibility of more localized impact of accounting scandals and supports accounting regulations targeted at individual industries.

We examine Chinese companies that issue both A-shares in mainland China and H-shares in Hong Kong. A-shares are restricted to mainland Chinese investors, while H-shares are available to Hong Kong and international investors. We find that H-shares exhibit significant exposure to Hong Kong market factors and behave more like Hong Kong stocks than mainland Chinese stocks. However, H-shares retain significant exposure to their domestic market and therefore provide foreign investors with diversification opportunities. We find a large time-varying H-share price discount relative to A-shares, and this discount is highly correlated with domestic and foreign market factors and relative market illiquidity.

This paper provides new evidence on the impact of the housing collateral lending channel on entrepreneurial activities by allowing homeowners to access property equity and invest in new businesses. We exploit dual housing property rights forms in China as an instrument, where complete access to collateral values is only legally granted to homeowners with full property rights (FPR), with no access for those without FPR. Using data from a large survey, we find that local house price growth significantly increases the probability of starting a new business for FPR homeowners relative to the control group. The effects are robust when we rely on the exogenous shock induced by the house purchase restriction and primarily driven by homeowners without household debt. Macro analysis supports a positive correlation between the concentration of FPR homeowners and employment and economic growth, where homeowners are better able to obtain external financing via the collateral channel.

This study assesses whether the implementation of Regulation Fair Disclosure (Reg FD) has affected the quantity and quality of information in credit markets. We find that, after Reg FD, borrowing from new lenders was associated with a higher loan spread. We also document that, after Reg FD, (1) borrowers became more dependent on relationship lending; (2) lead lenders retained a higher loan share; and (3) a typical loan syndicate involved a smaller number of participating lenders. We interpret these results as evidence of an increased level of information asymmetry in credit markets after Reg FD.