To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
5 results ✕ Clear filters

Director gender and mergers and acquisitions

Journal of Corporate Finance 2014 28, 185-200
Does director gender influence CEO empire building? Does it affect the bid premium paid for target firms? Less overconfident female directors less overestimate merger gains. As a result, firms with female directors are less likely to make acquisitions and if they do, pay lower bid premia. Using acquisition bids by S&P 1500 companies during 1997–2009 we find that each additional female director is associated with 7.6% fewer bids, and each additional female director on a bidder board reduces the bid premium paid by 15.4%. Our findings support the notion that female directors help create shareholder value through their influence on acquisition decisions. We also discuss other possible interpretations of our findings.

Leased capital and the investment-<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" altimg="si5.svg" display="inline" id="d1e5737"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math> relation

Journal of Corporate Finance 2023 80, 102354
Leased capital accounts for a large fraction of U.S. public firms’ total productive physical capital. In this paper, we extend the neoclassical investment q theory with financial frictions by explicitly considering firms’ option to lease. Our model features firms’ optimal buy-versus-lease decisions with collateral constraints and monitoring costs, and gives a strong implication that measured Tobin’s Q has to be adjusted by leased capital. Empirically, we use our model as guidance to construct the lease-adjusted Tobin’s Q, consistent with the recent leasing accounting change (ASC 842). We show that our lease-adjusted Tobin’s Q is a superior proxy for investment opportunities, especially for firms that rent more capital.

Debtor-in-possession financing, loan-to-loan, and loan-to-own

Journal of Corporate Finance 2016 39, 121-138
This paper provides new evidence on the roles and strategies adopted by different types of debtor-in-possession (DIP) lenders: “loan-to-loan” (LTL) lenders—prepetition secured bank lenders providing DIP financing, and “loan-to-own” (LTO) lenders—activist investors (i.e., hedge funds or private equity funds) providing DIP financing. We find that LTL is more likely in Chapter 11 firms with better operating performance, when prepetition bank lenders' stakes are at risk, or when they have prior lending relationships with the distressed borrower. In contrast, LTO is more likely in small firms or when prepetition bank lenders' loans are over-collateralized. Finally, we show that much of the governance improvement at the emergence is attributed to LTO lenders. We conclude that creditors of different institutional types adopt distinct strategies to enforce their control rights under Chapter 11 reorganization and to have contrasting effects on the governance outcomes of emerged firms.

CEO pay cuts and forced turnover: Their causes and consequences

Journal of Corporate Finance 2012 18(2), 291-310
We study large discrete decreases in CEO pay and compare them to CEO forced turnover. The determinants are similar, as are the performance improvements after the action. After the pay cut, the CEO pay-for-performance sensitivity is abnormally high, such that the CEO can restore his pay level by reversing the poor performance. After either a pay cut or forced turnover, CEOs reduce investment and leverage, and improve performance, on average. Together, our results show that the possibility of these large compensation cuts provides ex ante incentives for CEOs to exert effort to avoid poor performance and that CEOs take actions to improve poor performance once pay is cut. The similarity of the causes and outcomes of large pay cuts compared to forced turnover suggests that large pay cuts are used as a substitute for forced turnover, helping to explain why forced turnover is rare.

National Culture and the Value Implications of Corporate Environmental and Social Performance

Journal of Corporate Finance 2021 71, 102123
We examine why environmental and social (E/S) performance vary across countries and firms, and evaluate the value implications. Using a sample of 33,021 firm-year observations representing 4587 firms from 43 countries over the 2003–2015 period and applying hierarchical linear modeling, we find that individualism is positively associated with firm-level E/S performance. We show that two country-level channels—freedom of the press and protection of equal rights—and three firm-level channels—managerial discretion, board diversity, and corporate transparency—link individualism to E/S performance. We find a positive association between firm-level E/S performance and firm value, with three firm-level channels—cash flows, cash flow variability, and cost of equity—linking E/S performance to firm value. This positive association is stronger in more individualistic countries. Finally, we find that internationalization weakens the role of national culture; however, it accentuates the positive association between firm-level E/S performance and firm value.