Knowledge that Transforms

The case is set in Denmark in 2019. It describes the seed funding of Leggso, a cleantech start-up that was developing a new technology for turning lignin (wood scrap) into liquid biofuel. This business clearly had a very large potential upside. The venture, a university spin-off developing within the Danish Cleantech Hub ecosystem, faced several major uncertainties: IP strength, managerial skills, market acceptance, competition. Together with its being a seed stage opportunity, this made investing in the company a riskier choice than usual for Patryk Kyllens, senior investment manager at NORDIA, a VC firm active in the Danish Cleantech Hub ecosystem that had entered negotiations with Leggso. Patryk crafted a syndicated tranched seed round to make the deal appealing to the Supervisory Board of NORDIA. Tranching meant Leggso would now receive a first tranche and would have to satisfy a set of milestones to access the second tranche, twelve months ahead. The deal was signed in April 2018. In March of 2019, Leggso found itself failing one of the milestones. How should Patryk manage this situation? Should he renegotiate and keep investing, or call it a day?

We study how reputation incentives of influential independent directors (those holding multiple directorships) affect CEO compensation and firm financial reporting decisions. We find that CEO equity-based incentives, measured by CEO delta, vega and the number of equity grants are positively related to these directors' reputation incentives. These director reputation incentives also mitigate the perverse CEO incentives to inflate earnings, which arise from such high-powered compensation structures, by motivating increased board monitoring to limit discretionary accruals and real activity-based earnings management. These findings are invariant to endogeneity adjustments under multiple approaches, including exogenous changes in reputation incentives.

Using unique datasets on investor bidding and on investment bankers' biography, we examine the role of individual investment bankers in the process of IPO pricing. We find that when an investment banker has a social connection with a mutual fund manager, this manager is significantly more likely to (1) participate in the IPO, (2) submit above average bid prices, (3) realize lower IPO returns. The effect of investment bankers' social relationships is more pronounced when the issuer has low accounting quality and/or when the underwriter is a small bank. Further evidence shows that social relationships between investment bankers and fund managers reduce IPO underpricing. Overall, our findings suggest that social interactions help individual investment bankers to efficiently exchange value-relevant information with IPO investors.

This paper provides a comparative analysis of project finance (PF) and traditional corporate finance (CF) bond spreads and pricing. Using a cross-section of 47,196 bonds issued worldwide in the 1993–2020 period, we show that PF and CF bonds are differently priced, PF bonds have higher spreads than comparable CF bonds, and although ratings are the most important pricing determinant for PF and CF bonds at issuance, investors rely on other contractual, macroeconomic, and firms' characteristics beyond these ratings. Our results do not support the hypothesis of PF transactions as mechanisms of reducing sponsoring firms' funding costs: the cost of borrowing affects financing choices and PF transactions' weighted average spread is higher than that of comparable CF bond deals. We also find that economies of scale, risk management, and information asymmetry arguments affect sponsoring firms' choice between PF and CF transactions.

We examine the effect of policy uncertainty on firms' strategy of corporate social responsibility (CSR). During uncertain times, firms strategically increase their commitment to CSR causes. Policy uncertainty is positively associated with CSR performance regardless of the estimation method. CSR strategy can substitute for lobbying when firms attempt to manage policy uncertainty. Improved CSR performance can reduce firms' exposure to policy uncertainty which indicates that CSR commitment can deliver insurance-like benefits. The findings highlight the value of CSR commitments during uncertain times.

While most cryptocurrency financial activity is conducted on centralized exchanges, decentralized finance (DeFi) has experienced a particular surge with roughly 90,000 users at the start of 2020 to 4.28 million by the end of 2021. Based on data collected from a popular crypto-asset data aggregation service and manually collected data, we document the rapid growth in decentralized exchanges and their differences in volume and price dynamics from centralized exchanges. Next, we investigate the role of airdrops and governance tokens as mechanisms for expanding the base of users and driving up the value of an exchange. While our results do not have a causal interpretation, they provide preliminary evidence that both mechanisms are effective for expanding and strengthening networks, particularly for decentralized exchanges. We also exploit two event studies that suggest the growth in decentralized exchanges is not driven by speculation, but at least partially by value-creating cybersecurity benefits.

This paper studies how culture works as an implicit incentive alignment mechanism in corporate alliances. We measure the ancestral connection between different corporate headquarters places, using historical immigration from different countries to different areas of the U. S. When forming business alliances, the ancestral composition of the area where firms locate plays an important role in their choices of partners and the location of new ventures. Exploiting immigration to U.S. cities induced by WWI and the immigration acts of the 1920s, we find that ancestral connection driven by the supply-push component of historical immigrant inflows is associated with an increase in alliance intensity today. Finally, partnering firms experience significantly better performance when the ancestral connection between their headquarters or between their inventors is stronger. Shared values and beliefs between firms' key stakeholders likely underlie the role of ancestral connection.

We propose an accounting framework that maps the dispersion of borrowing costs along the debt maturity structure to the misallocation of productive resources. Specifically, we decompose the effects of credit misallocation into two distinct channels: limited access to debt finance (the scale effect) and distortion in the composition of debt across maturities (the composition effect). Our estimates suggest that an efficient allocation of debt could increase TFP by approximately 14.4% in the US manufacturing sector, of which roughly 10% is attributable to the composition of debt. Reducing inefficiencies in the composition of debt would result in TFP losses due to access and composition of factor inputs being reduced by 9.7% and 0.4%, respectively.

We study the relationship between buyout and venture capital (VC) funds’ returns, and more typically available proxies—exits via M&A or IPO. We further explore the effects of filters on the selection of M&As and IPOs (to emphasize successes), on the relationship. We show that some of these filters can reduce the count of exits by as much as 80% without significantly improving the correlation between exits and fund returns. We also show that for venture capital funds, counting acquisitions that are at least twice the amount of funding raised results in the best correlation between exits via an acquisition and fund returns. Finally, when the sample comprises young startups – that are perhaps not yet ready for any form of exit – follow-on funding, employment, website ranking, and patent activity can be used as proxies for exits in place of IPOs or acquisitions.

We document that US IPOs that take place during a world cup in football (soccer), compared to IPOs before or after, exhibit 9% lower underpricing and 6% lower price adjustment. IPOs during world cups receive less attention from foreign investors and exhibit significantly higher long-run returns. Our results are robust to excluding the IPO bubble period of 1999 and 2000, including only listings during summer months, controlling for overall market sentiment and market conditions, and to using various matched samples of non-world cup IPOs. Firm characteristics of world cup IPOs are indistinguishable from those of non-world cup IPOs, suggesting that selection is not driving the results. Consistent with prior studies showing that world cups affect market sentiment, we show that this extends to US IPOs, where lower sentiment, driven by foreign investors, leads to reduced investor attention and lower valuations.