This paper examines how environmental and social (ES) performance, proxied by related incidents, affect the managerial and analyst tones in quarterly earnings conference calls and its incremental effect on post-earnings call returns. We document that firms experiencing poor ES performance in the quarter prior to the earnings call exhibit more negative management tone after controlling for quarterly financial performance metrics. Tone difference in conference calls between managers and analysts predicts negative abnormal returns in the three-day window around the call. In the 60-day post-call period, we show that firms with poor ES performance exhibit returns negatively related to the tone difference on the conference call – low tone difference leads to return continuation and high tone difference predicts reversals for firms with positive earnings surprises. These results are consistent with an increase in information asymmetry and lower transparency for firms following poor ES performance

Economic, political, and public policy uncertainty affect merger and acquisition (M&A) activity. In this paper, we use Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) interventions in the M&A market to investigate whether regulatory interventions also matter. Our results support this conjecture. Using the Hoberg and Phillips (2010) similarity scores to identify product market competitors, we confirm a clear and significant DOJ/FTC regulatory enforcements' deterrence effect on future M&A transaction activity, a result robust to many alternative specifications. Additional evidence indicates that this deterrence effect is (at least partly) driven by both regulatory outcome uncertainty and regulatory intervention probability channels. Our results identify an (un)intended consequence of antitrust regulation that affects M&A activity

This paper examines whether private equity (PE)-backed companies are better able to remain active on export markets compared to similar non-PE firms, when hit by a negative shock. We look at two such recent shocks, namely the global financial crisis (GFC) and COVID-19 pandemic. We construct two matched samples, one for each crisis period, to assess the resilience of exporting under PE ownership in recessionary periods. We then explore how improvements in working capital management allow PE-backed firms to engage in international activities and maintain their export relationships relative to similar, non-PE-backed firms. Our results show that the export activities of PE-backed firms are significantly more resilient to the effects of the GFC but less pronounced following COVID-19. PE investment enhances working capital management, which in turn improves the persistence in export markets at the onset of the crises

We develop a search model of mergers and acquisitions (M&A), intermediated by private equity (PE) funds which may face pressure to sell. The selling pressure leads to the development of a secondary buyout (SBO) market, enabling PE funds to bail each other out. Interestingly, an increase in the number of PE funds can improve each fund’s value, because the enhanced benefits of SBOs can prevail over the reduction in value from narrower buy-sell spreads due to more intense competition. We calibrate the model using data for the US middle market and find that PE funds could lose 64% of their valuation without SBOs. Moreover, the increase in the number of funds from 2000 to 2017 contributes to a 48% increase in fund valuation due to the complementarity among funds. Nevertheless, our model predicts that this mechanism might have peaked in 2021, and more PE funds could decrease their value.

This paper examines how the impairment of main banks’ balance sheets affects corporate cash-holding behavior during the 2008 financial crisis using a firm–bank matched panel dataset of 2,520 firms in Japan. The major findings of this paper are as follows. First, the impairment of main banks increases firms’ cash holdings during this financial crisis. Second, this tendency is more pronounced among firms with limited financing sources and those with unstable main bank relationships. Third, holding large amounts of cash increases the value of firms with main bank impairment during the 2008 financial crisis

Using a novel dataset of firm product introductions, we examine whether public short campaigns (PSCs) have real impacts on targets. Targets introduce fewer new products and experience declines in productivity and product quality relative to matched firms following PSCs. These declines in product outcomes are partly attributed to the withdrawal of support from key stakeholders, resulting in reduced access to external capital, decreased employee commitment, and weakened customer relationships. Our results suggest that the public nature of PSCs has distinctive impacts on target firms compared to traditional short selling, primarily through their impact on the firm's stakeholders.

Corporate lobbying positively influences firm innovation outcomes. Firms that engage more in lobbying have more patents, more patent citations, and greater patent value. We establish this causality using instrumental variables estimation. Corporate lobbying plays a role of persuasion and fosters firm innovation by transmitting valuable information to politicians, which enhances firms' external political environment. The impact of lobbying on innovation is more pronounced for firms with comparative advantages in the product market, financial health, ESG performance, and institutional support. These results contribute to a deeper understanding of the role of firms' information value in the political process and provide new insights into how lobbying buffs firm development.

We examine the impact of the increased presence of female board members on corporate carbon emissions. Using the staggered enactment of gender diversity reforms in different countries, we find that an increase in the number of female directors after the reforms leads to a reduction in corporate carbon emissions. This effect is particularly more pronounced when the reform is legislative, and occurs in collectivistic countries. Furthermore, the effect of enhanced female board representation on carbon emission reduction is greater following the Paris Agreement. This study offers valuable insights for policymakers who consider gender diversity reform as a strategy against climate change.

We investigate whether options trading activities affect underlying firms' degree of cost stickiness. Using a panel of US companies, we find that options trading activities reduce the underlying firms' level of cost stickiness. Our findings are robust to alternative proxies for options trading activities and cost stickiness, two-stage least-squares regression, and two quasi-natural experiments. Additional analyses indicate that the negative effect of options trading activities on cost stickiness is more pronounced for firms with higher availability of cash flows and lower corporate governance and audit quality. Finally, we implement a mediator analysis and show that higher options trading activities improve underlying firms' investment efficiency as they have more efficient corporate resource allocation via lower levels of cost stickiness. Overall, our results underscore the monitoring and governance role of options trading activities in enhancing underlying firms' information environment and limiting their insiders' opportunistic behaviors, resulting in fewer corporate resource misallocation activities via reduced degrees of cost stickiness.

Carbon trading is an important market mechanism to achieve carbon neutrality. This study explores the possible impact of carbon markets on the stock market performance of listed companies using data from 2013 to 2022 in China's carbon trading pilot regions. Using the event shock of delayed trading in the Chinese carbon market, we attempt to answer the question of the role of green innovation hidden under the compliance event. Results show that a 1% increase in carbon market turnover leads to an average decrease of CNY 0.123 in the company's stock price. Large-scale companies that have been listed for a short time and have poor green innovation capabilities are more vulnerable to the carbon market. Under delayed trading, firms with high green innovation capability will be profitable. By contrast, profitability is not reflected in low green innovation firms. Companies with low green innovation can reduce stock market performance owing to the carbon market's undersupply situation. Our study reveals the stock performance of different carbon trading entities under delayed trading, providing a realistic basis for firms to choose green innovation while helping to improve carbon trading market dynamics.