Cash-rich acquirers on average perform better than their cash-poor counterparts. This observation is driven by financially constrained acquirers and by the deals made between the 1990s and 2000s. It is robust to alternative measures of financial constraints, to both the short term and the long term, and to the different institutional setting such as the U.K. We conclude cash richness primarily reflects acquirer managers' private information of deal quality instead of agency costs. The precautionary motive can explain the positive cash holdings effect on acquirer performance.

We examine the impact of incentive fees paid to IPO underwriters at issuers' discretion on IPO pricing and short-term performance. We expect that better-incentivized underwriters produce more information required for IPO pricing reducing underwriters' reliance on investors' information production which requires compensation through IPO underpricing. Using a novel dataset, we find that incentive compensation mitigates the partial-adjustment phenomenon. IPOs with stronger incentives have more informative price ranges, higher price revisions, longer road shows and lower initial returns largely due to interaction effects between underwriters' incentives and their information-production capabilities. Using a battery of tests and addressing endogeneity, our results remain robust.

In this study, we explored the presence of correlated investment choices (i.e., herd behaviour) among international buyout funds by distinguishing among the contemporaneous and the following herding of smaller funds towards the top market players (i.e., the top quartile in terms of the fund size). In our analyses, we found that the industry herding towards the largest ones is common in private equity (PE) but mostly during market contractions or the deterioration of general market conditions. Moreover, we also found that as capital inflows into the PE industry slow down, herding occurs more often. This finding is consistent with the increasing competition for new capital fundraising in downturns, which can induce PE funds to herd more. We also found that both types of herding generate higher fund returns and lower risk for funds that are capable of herding. Additionally, we documented the persistence in herding.

In this paper, we investigate whether fund-specific risk helps explain performance persistence in private equity funds, using detailed deal-level cash flow information at both the fund and deal levels. We further extend existing findings to international evidence on buyout and venture capital (VC) by testing the impact of various risk measures. We find that risk is an important driver of performance persistence and helps explain such persistence. We also find persistence in risk in private equity, in particular persistence in downside volatility for both buyout and VC funds. Finally, we document that fund performance is more strongly affected by fund managers able to minimize downside losses than selecting outperforming portfolio companies. This effect is strongest for buyout but, to a weaker extent, also holds for VC. Our results are further robust to controlling for legal factors at the country level.

This paper examines the impact of VC ownership beyond the IPO listing on important and consequential corporate decisions in a firm's lifetime. We find that VC funds delay the initiation of dividends by approximately two years, delay the use of external growth strategies, and postpone introduction to the corporate bond market. These results are consistent with the view that VC funds extend the growth phase of the firm. We show that their presence at the time of these decisions leads to positive stock price reactions, suggesting that they provide a certification effect that signals continued growth opportunities, and that VC certification is not limited to the IPO listing.

We examine the determinants of an IPO firm's decision to trade on a when-issued market and find that better quality firms are more likely to trade on this market. Our ‘what-if’ analysis shows that for companies that choose to have when-issued trading, the actual offer price is almost 26% higher than it would have been had these firms chosen not to trade on this market. We interpret this higher offer price as a ‘rent’ that investors pay to acquire shares of such companies. We also show that the informational accuracy of the UK when-issued market is better than that of continental European when-issued markets.

This paper examines the benefits to venture capital firms of their officers holding directorships in mature public companies in terms of fundraising and investment performance. Our empirical results show that venture capital firms raise more funds, set higher fund-raising targets, and are more likely to successfully exit their investments post-appointment of their officers to boards of directors of S&P 1500 companies. Directorship status in mature public firms provides venture capital firms with enhanced networks, visibility, and credibility, all of which facilitate their fundraising activities. In addition, the knowledge, expertise, and experience acquired through holding directorships in mature public firms are beneficial for their portfolio companies, as measured by the likelihood of successful exits.

Recent U.S. policy encourages anchor investments to facilitate initial public offerings (IPOs) and increase companies' access to external finance. As access to external funds relies on stocks remaining listed, we study anchor investors' impact on how long IPOs stay listed. We examine two types of anchor investors in Hong Kong: strategic and cornerstone investors, that are similar to U.S. anchor investors, but show varying levels of commitment to the IPO. We find that IPOs backed by more committed investors, with longer post-IPO commitments (lockups), stay listed longer. This suggests that the success of U.S. policies may require investors' commitment.