The market reaction to nonroutine trades by executives and directors is conventionally viewed as increasing in the market’s assessment of insider informativeness about firm value. Using the market reaction as our instrument, we test the proposition that female directors appointed after Norway’s pioneering board gender-balancing quota law exhibit a degree of informativeness similar to that of male directors. Consistent with this proposition, we first show that the average market reaction to female director purchases jumps from a prequota value of zero to a level similar to that of male directors. Second, the market reaction is increasing in the board’s director network connectivity (but not in director busyness). Third, regardless of gender, the positive post-quota market reaction to insider purchases does not translate into holding-period adjusted abnormal performance. Fourth, insider purchase activity by both male and female directors increases significantly during the year following the 2008 financial crisis (when boards were already gender-balanced). This gender-neutral increase in insider purchases caused by the exogenous market-wide stock price drop further suggests that female directors are as informed as their male counterparts about firm value.

We examine the effect of voluntary climate risk disclosure on Credit Default Swap (CDS) premiums. We develop a structural model, in which climate-related disclosures serve as an information source reducing climate change uncertainty. The model predicts a negative relation between the informativeness of climate risk disclosure and the CDS premium, and asymmetric effects of positive and negative disclosure tone on the CDS premium. Using climate risk measures quantified from earnings call transcripts, we provide evidence supporting these predictions with causal inference. Our study suggests that climate risk is priced in the CDS market, where investors pay attention to climate risk disclosures.