To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.
Fields:
3 results
✕ Clear filters
Too much to learn? The (un)intended consequences of RegTech development on mergers and acquisitions
Regulatory and technological (RegTech) developments have been changing the nature of financial markets in recent decades. This paper documents the real effects of RegTech in the market of corporate control. Exploiting the staggered implementation of the EDGAR system from 1993 to 1996 as quasi-exogenous RegTech shocks, we find that RegTech developments reduce firm acquisitiveness, especially for growth firms, solo-bidder deals, and stock-based acquisitions. Our main findings still hold when employing the stack-cohort approach to address concerns regarding biased staggered DiD estimators. In addition, EDGAR implementation discourages informed trading and lowers the acquirers' announcement returns. Overall, our deal-level analyses show how RegTech development matters for firm investment decisions with more granularities. Our paper differs from but complements recent empirical evidence that EDGAR implementation increases the level of overall investment, suggesting that dampened managerial learning induces firms to switch from highly risky and uncertain projects (M&As) to routine projects with less uncertainty (capital expenditures).
Invisible hand and helping hand: Private placement of public equity in China
In this study of private placement of public equity (PEP) in China, we examine post-placement stock performance and the possible bases for regulatory approval for PEP applications. We find that firms receiving approvals for PEP issues are financially stronger than those rejected by regulatory authorities and experience significant positive long-term abnormal returns following the placements. These long-term abnormal returns are higher when controlling shareholders participate in the placements and when the capital raised is allocated to asset restructuring or M&As. The evidence supports the view that the government offers a “helping hand” by screening PEP applications and approving those with promising investments and capable investors. Investor overoptimism about investment opportunities at firms that issue equity privately is constrained because PEP participants can effectively monitor and discipline management and help improve investment efficiency over time.