We investigate external and internal corporate governance activity observed at Japanese banks over 1985–1996. External governance appears to be inactive, and even after the onset of the banking crisis of the 1990s there are few mergers, failures, and other changes in ownership and control. Prior to the banking crisis we do not find a relation between bank performance and executive turnover. In contrast, non-routine turnover of bank presidents is inversely related to both stock returns and profitability in the 1990s. Consequently, internal governance activity is observable following the onset of the Japanese banking crisis, a period otherwise characterized by inactive external governance and regulatory forbearance.

This study contributes to the literature on the role of the board by investigating the effect of board composition on the practice of earnings management in Canada. We find that earnings are managed upward to avoid reporting losses and earnings declines. While outside directors, as a whole, do not reduce abnormal accruals, directors from financial intermediaries reduce earnings management, and the board representation of active institutional shareholders reduces it further. We do not find that monitoring of abnormal accruals by outside directors, as a whole, or by directors from financial institutions is more effective after the issuance of the Toronto Stock Exchange's Corporate Governance Guidelines of 1994. Finally, we do not find that earnings management decreases with the average tenure of outside directors as board members of the firm, either. Our findings suggest that adding outside directors to the board may not achieve improvement in governance practices by itself, especially in jurisdictions where ownership is highly concentrated and the outside directors' labor market may not be well developed.

Asian initial public offerings (IPOs) require investors to pay subscription funds up-front upon submission of applications, and these funds are locked-up for 1–3 weeks without interest. Hence, the IPO process entails an explicit financing cost (opportunity cost) whether investors borrow funds or use their own funds to apply for IPO shares. The IPO subscription costs are not trivial, especially in a high interest rate environment or when an IPO is highly oversubscribed. These costs should be considered in any comparison of IPO returns across countries.