To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
7 results ✕ Clear filters

On the Class of Elliptical Distributions and their Applications to the Theory of Portfolio Choice

Journal of Finance 1983
It is shown that the class of elliptical distributions extend the Tobin 14 separation theorem, Bawa's 2 rules of ordering uncertain prospects, Ross's 12 mutual fund separation theorems, and the results of the CAPM to non-normal distributions, which are not necessarily stable. Further, the mean-covariance matrix framework is generalized to a mean-characteristic matrix framework in which the characteristic matrix is the basis for a spread or risk measure, and a generalized equilibrium pricing equation is arrived at. The implications to empirical testing of the CAPM and modeling the empirical distribution of speculative prices are discussed.

On the Class of Elliptical Distributions and their Applications to the Theory of Portfolio Choice

Journal of Finance 1983 38(3), 745-752
It is shown that the class of elliptical distributions extend the Tobin [14] separation theorem, Bawa's [2] rules of ordering uncertain prospects, Ross's [12] mutual fund separation theorems, and the results of the CAPM to non‐normal distributions, which are not necessarily stable. Further, the mean‐covariance matrix framework is generalized to a mean‐characteristic matrix framework in which the characteristic matrix is the basis for a spread or risk measure, and a generalized equilibrium pricing equation is arrived at. The implications to empirical testing of the CAPM and modeling the empirical distribution of speculative prices are discussed.

Leverage and the Cross‐Section of Equity Returns

Journal of Finance 2019 74(3), 1431-1471
Building on theoretical asset pricing literature, we examine the role of market risk and the size, book‐to‐market (BTM), and volatility anomalies in the cross‐section of unlevered equity returns. Compared with levered (stock) returns, unlevered market beta plays a more important role in explaining the cross‐section of unlevered equity returns, even after controlling for size and BTM. The size effect is weakened, while the value premium and the volatility puzzle virtually disappear for unlevered returns. We show that leverage induces heteroskedasticity in returns. Unlevering returns removes this pattern, which is otherwise difficult to address by controlling for leverage in regressions.