Knowledge that Transforms

To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:

Loan market benefits of (High) IPO underpricing

Journal of Financial Intermediation 2025 61, 101132 open access
We provide novel evidence on the loan market benefits of high IPO underpricing. We show that greater underpricing is associated with a significantly larger within-firm reduction of post-IPO borrowing costs. This benefit of underpricing is less pronounced for firms with high ex-ante information asymmetry and is concentrated in firms with a high demand for advertisements. In addition, neither price revision before the IPO nor the short-term or long-term stock return after the IPO has a similar effect. Our results suggest that underpricing affects borrowing costs through an attention channel and highlight a real economic effect of underpricing from the loan market.

Do minority banks matter?

Journal of Financial Intermediation 2025 63, 101163
This paper estimates the elasticity of minority credit supply to deposit shares of Minority Depository Institutions (MDIs). I use within-county tract-level variation in exposure to the Community Reinvestment Act and show that if a census tract loses MDI presence following a merger between an MDI bank and a community bank, its minority mortgage credit declines by 40%. These effects are driven by the loss of operationally efficient MDIs, and about half of the overall impact is attributable to the loss of mission alone. A 1% increase in county market shares of such tracts leads to roughly a 3% decrease in county-level minority homeownership.

How to release capital requirements in an economic downturn? Evidence from euro area credit register

Journal of Financial Intermediation 2025 63, 101148 open access
This paper investigates the impact of the first system-wide capital relief package adopted by euro area prudential authorities, to support bank lending to firms at the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. By leveraging confidential supervisory and credit register data, we uncover two main findings. First, capital relief measures support banks’ capacity to supply credit to firms. Second, the type of relief matters. Banks increase their credit supply in response to measures that reduce binding capital requirements and affect banks’ ability to distribute dividends. By contrast, discretionary relief measures that do not affect dividend policy are met with limited success. Moreover, requirement releases are more effective for banks with ex-ante lower capital headroom and for lending to smaller firms. These findings provide novel insights on the design of effective bank capital requirement releases in crisis times and, more generally, of policies to support bank credit in times of economic distress.

Why DeFi lending? Evidence from Aave V2

Journal of Financial Intermediation 2025 63, 101166
Decentralised finance (DeFi) lending protocols have experienced significant growth recently, yet the motivations driving investors remain largely unexplored. We use granular, transaction-level data from Aave, a leading player in the DeFi lending market, to study these motivations. Our theoretical and empirical findings reveal that the search for yield predominantly drives liquidity provision in DeFi lending pools, whereas borrowing activity is mainly influenced by speculative and, to some extent, governance motives. Both retail and large investors seek potential high returns through market movements and price speculation, however the latter engage in DeFi borrowing relatively more than the former also to influence protocol decisions and accrue more significant governance rights.

Anticipating binding constraints: An analysis of debt covenants

Journal of Financial Intermediation 2025 63, 101160
This paper shows that anticipation can meaningfully impact inferences about the effects of covenant violations. Using textual analysis of SEC filings and earnings call transcripts, I construct a measure of covenant concerns that identifies instances where firms disclose forward-looking risks related to their debt covenants. On average, nearly 30 percent of U.S. non-financial firms report covenant concerns each year. While the real effects of covenant violations are robust for most outcomes, the estimated impact of some variables, including cash acquisitions, default risk, and credit line availability, can be overstated. This finding highlights the importance of selection around violation: firms that anticipate and successfully avoid violations differ systematically from firms that fail to avoid them.

Geographic diversification, climate risk, and bank lending: Evidence from farm loans

Journal of Financial Intermediation 2025 63, 101152 open access
This study examines how geographically diversified banks adjust lending practices in response to abnormal hot temperatures, a proxy for climate risk, and finds that these banks reduce small farm lending by 2–3 percent more than geographically constrained banks after a standard deviation increase in abnormal temperatures. Geographically diversified banks demonstrate proactive portfolio risk management by prioritizing credit in core markets and reallocating funds away from high-risk non-core regions, leaving lending gaps in affected counties. These findings highlight the importance of geographic diversification in building climate resiliency for banks while reducing the total credit available to farmers in a region.

Sideshow or center stage? Information transmission between CDS and equity markets

Journal of Financial Intermediation 2025 63, 101151
Recent studies provide strong evidence that credit default swap (CDS) markets play a leading role in information intermediation. This paper proposes a model to rationalize the information transmission mechanism between the CDS and equity markets. In our model, informed traders with an informational advantage obtained from monitoring credit markets engage in capital structure arbitrage and trade strategically to exploit mispricings between individual stocks and CDS. In line with our model’s prediction, our empirical results provide evidence of a contemporaneous channel transmitting structural CDS shocks to equities. A positive shock to CDS decreases stock returns contemporaneously and over the long run. This credit-to-equity channel dominates the reverse transmission channel from stocks to CDS. Robustness tests confirm the role of the CDS market as a preferred venue for informed trading, independently of credit rating events or business sectors.