Deterrence or self-protection: Effects of anti-mafia campaign on corporate fraud
This paper identifies a novel channel—corporate fraud—through which local firms protect themselves during anti-mafia periods. We initially explore the impact of the anti-mafia campaign on mafia-like forces captured by accepted mafia-like criminal cases. The results indicate that the average number of accepted mafia-like criminal cases increases by 10.03%. More importantly, the accepted mafia-like criminal cases committed by firms also exhibit a notable increase, mainly within the first 30 months of the anti-mafia campaign. We then theorize that the anti-mafia campaign may have two contradictory effects on corporate fraud: deterrence and self-protection. The main results show that the self-protection effect prevails over the deterrence effect and that firms are more likely to commit fraud to strategically protect themselves from potential losses. The baseline findings reveal that the fraud occurrence of an average firm increases by 44.07% during anti-mafia periods.