We study whether floods can affect financial stability through a credit risk channel. Our focus is onthe Netherlands, a country situated partly below sea level, where insurance policies exclude property damages caused by some types of floods. Using geocoded data for close to EUR 650 billion in real estate exposures, we consider possible implications of such floods for bank capital. For a set of 38 adverse scenarios, we estimate that flood-related property damages lead to capital declines that mostly range between 30 and 50 basis points. We highlight how starting-point loan-to-value ratios are one important driver of capital impacts. Our estimates focus on property damages as the main transmission channel and are also subject to a number of assumptions. If climate change continues, more frequent floods or flood-related macrofinancial disruptions may have stronger implications for financial stability than our estimates so far indicate.

This study examines why firms’ access to finance differs across countries and assesses the extent to which democracy and financial liberalisation account for these variations. Using political economy and liberalisation theories as a foundation, we analyse a comprehensive dataset of over 110,000 firms across 112 economies between 2006 and 2021. Although previous research identifies firm-level and macroeconomic sources of financial frictions, evidence on the institutional drivers of cross-country financial access remains limited. Our findings show that democracy and financial liberalisation, when considered independently, are associated with reduced access to finance. However, when both conditions coexist, they ease financing barriers and enhance access to finance. These results remain consistent across multiple robustness tests, including alternative model specifications, endogeneity corrections, and various measures of institutional quality and financial openness. Overall, the study highlights that neither democracy nor liberalisation alone is sufficient to enhance access to credit. Instead, simultaneous institutional strengthening and financial market access are necessary to ease financing barriers. This has important policy implications, particularly for emerging and developing economies seeking to expand firm-level access to capital and stimulate economic growth.

We leverage differences in central bank independence and financial stability sentiment across countries to investigate the variability in banks’ stock market reactions to prudential policy announcements during the COVID-19 crisis. Our findings reveal that the relaxation of both macro- and micro-prudential policies leads to negative cumulative abnormal returns (CARs), the reaction being attenuated in countries where the central bank is more independent or communicates deteriorations in financial stability. The CARs around the announcement dates are 0.75 percentage points (pp) and 6.89 pp higher for macro- and micro-prudential policy announcements, respectively, in countries with greater central bank independence compared to those with lesser independence. The difference is approximately 3.73 pp and 5.65 pp between banks located in countries where the central bank communicates a negative sentiment about financial stability, compared to those where a positive sentiment is conveyed. The positive impact of higher degrees of central bank independence and deteriorations in financial stability sentiment on bank market valuation is enhanced for smaller banks, as well as for banks in countries with greater fiscal flexibility and a higher prevalence of privately owned banks. (181 words)